Doggone it Jack! Dog toy featuring “bathroom humour” sparks trademark claim by Jack Daniels
As reported by Arizona Capitol Times, Jack Daniels is in a dispute with VIP Productions, a dog toy manufacturer, for allegedly infringing its trademark of the “Old No. 7 Tennessee Sour Mash Whiskey” label that appears on its bottles.
The dog toy in question imitates the shape of the Jack Daniels bottle and design of its label. However, the toy’s label reads “The Old No. 2 on your Tennessee Carpet” in place of the original text, and displays “43% Poo by Vol.” and “100% Smelly” where the alcohol percentage would normally be shown.
Jack Daniels brought a lawsuit to stop VIP Productions from producing or selling the toy, which its attorney claims degrades the sophistication of the brand with “juvenile bathroom humour”.
At trial, Jack Daniels was successful in its claim, largely based on evidence that 29% of consumers were under the impression that the whiskey company had a hand in manufacturing the dog toy. However, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeal overturned this decision and found that the humorous message at the heart of the dog toy did not violate the Jack Daniels trademark.
The suit may see further appeal however, as an attorney for Jack Daniels has suggested that the correct legal test, the “likelihood of confusion”, was not properly applied by the 9th Circuit Court.
The ultimate result of this action could have far-reaching effects on VIP Productions, as its website features other dog toys that appear similar to the recognizable bottles of Mountain Dew, Corona, and Heineken.
Authors: Sasha Seeber, 2020/2021 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@mebrooks01
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…