Dyson is known for making high-quality vacuums, hair dryers, and air purifiers. As reported by the Verge, a recently-published UK patent application reveals that the company may soon enter the headphone business as well. While this may seem off-brand for the manufacturing giant, Dyson’s design is for headphones that would simultaneously purify air. The air would be filtered out through a band that runs horizontally across the face and is connected to the earpieces on each end (see Figure 1a below). The filtered air would be directed toward the wearer’s nose and mouth. When the filter is not in use, the band could be pushed up to rest over the headband (see Figure 1b).
Although some consumers may not like the idea of wearing a device that partially obstructs their faces, the patent application notes that people around the world already wear face masks to protect themselves from inhaling highly polluted air.
The application states that the motors would be contained in the over-the-ear cups and rotate at a speed of approximately 12,000 rpm to pull in approximately 1.4 litres of air per second. This means the earpieces would contain motors that rotate more than 10 times faster than the average computer fan, which raises concerns regarding the potential noise of the motor and its impact on the sound quality of the headphones.
Dyson is not the only company that may be designing a wearable air purifier. AO Air recently announced its plans to retail a transparent facemask that filters air and expects the product to be available in July 2020. Whether Dyson will begin manufacturing the product remains to be seen, but it could be an appealing accessory for many in light of the growing concern over the harmful health effects of air pollution.
Authors: Jaclyn Tilak and Meg King
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@davealmine
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…