From Foam to Fortune: Crocs Inc. Prevails in Patent Infringement Case
Crocs Inc. has been awarded over $6 million following a decision regarding patent infringement by USA Dawgs and its subsidiary Double Diamond Distribution. Crocs was embroiled in years of litigation against USA Dawgs and Double Diamond Distribution over the Classic Clog design.
The dispute between Crocs Inc. and Double Diamond Distribution Ltd. has also extended to Canada. In 2022, the Federal Court ruled that Double Diamond Distribution Ltd., operating as Canada Dawgs, had infringed upon Crocs Inc.’s industrial design rights related to Crocs’ MAMMOTH line of fleece clogs (Industrial Design Registration No. 120, 939). As a consequence, the Federal Court awarded Crocs Canada, Inc. and Crocs Inc. nearly $650,000 for an accounting of Canada Dawgs’ profits, in addition to pre and post-judgment interest.
Crocs Inc. has a stern warning on the company website that states: “DO NOT COPY our products. We aggressively prosecute counterfeiting, intellectual property infringement, and customs seizure actions worldwide.”
Following the decision against USA Dawgs and Double Diamond Distribution, Crocs Inc.’s Chief Legal & Risk Officer, Daniel Hart, reportedly stated: “[t]he judgment not only reinforces the validity of our patent rights, it also reinforces our unrelenting determination to take forceful steps to protect our brand equity.”
Author: PJ Conlon, 2023/2024 Articling Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: istock.com/morgan23.
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…