Goodmans IP Litigation Team Represents NCS on Successful Patent Appeal
Over the past decade, the Goodmans IP Litigation Team has developed a specialized practice in assuming carriage of appeals taken from unsuccessful patent trial-level decisions. These appeals include:
- Evolution Technologies v. Human Care Canada, 2019 FCA 209;
- GEMAK Trust v. Jempak Corporation, 2022 FCA 141;
- Sandoz Canada v. Janssen, 2023 FCA 221; and
- Pharmascience v. Janssen, 2024 FCA 23.
In late 2023, by way of a lengthy trial decision of the Federal Court (2023 FC 1486), NCS Multistage Inc. (“NCS”) was found to infringe a patent related to downhole equipment used in hydraulic fracturing (or fracking).
Shortly thereafter, the Goodmans IP Litigation Team, led by Andrew Brodkin and Jordan Scopa, were retained to take carriage of NCS’s appeal.
After a hearing in early April 2025, this week, the Federal Court of Appeal issued a decision allowing NCS’s appeal, setting aside the relevant paragraphs of the trial judgment and remitting certain issues to be decided by the Federal Court: NCS v. Kobold, 2025 FCA 187.
The Federal Court of Appeal’s decision addresses issues relating to:
- claims construction (including claim scope and dependencies);
- double patenting (including the application of double patenting to divisional applications that expire on the same date as their parent application); and
- costs awards (including procedural fairness and the evidence required to support a claim to costs based on a percentage of actual legal fees).
Should you require any assistance in intellectual property litigation matters, including appeals, please do not hesitate to contact a member of the Goodmans IP Litigation Team.
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@macu_ic
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…