Indian Supreme Court opens door to Monsanto seed patents
The Indian Supreme Court has ruled that multinational agrochemical and agricultural technology company Monsanto can obtain and enforce patent protection for genetically-modified (GMO) cotton seeds.
Monsanto’s appeal to the Supreme Court arose from a 2015 patent infringement lawsuit against India-based Nuziveedu Seeds relating to genetically-modified “Bt” cotton seeds. Bt cotton is a genetically modified product designed to be resistant to the bollworm pest.
Upon termination of a licensing arrangement for the patented seeds, Nuziveedu sought to have Monsanto’s patent cancelled on the grounds that the patent related to unpatentable subject matter. The Delhi High Court denied Monsanto the seed patents in question on the grounds that certain categories of product, including seeds, plants, and animals, could not be patented under Indian law. Media reports suggested that, prior to the Supreme Court’s ruling that the seeds are patentable, farmers had begun to access unauthorized Bt cotton seeds through the grey market.
The Supreme Court ruling will have significant implications in India, which is the world’s largest producer of cotton. Some commentators have suggested that allowing patent protection for products such as GMO seeds will foster development and agricultural research and will bring greater certainty to the research sector.
Now that the Supreme Court has ruled that seeds may be patentable, it has remitted the determination of the validity of Monsanto’s specific patent and infringement to the Delhi High Court.
Author: Wes Dutcher-Walls, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@lishakov
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…