Iron Maiden, the English heavy metal band that has sold over 100 million records, is suing Danish company 3D Realms, for trademark infringement in California Federal Court.
3D Realms created a video game called “Ion Maiden”, which the band claims is an “incredibly blatant” infringement on their trademarked name. The band alleges that the video game name is “nearly identical to the Iron Maiden trademark in appearance, sound, and overall commercial impression”. As a result, they argue that it will “confuse consumers into believing [3D Realms’] products and services are somehow affiliated with or approved by Iron Maiden”.
In addition to the name dispute, the band alleges other similarities, such as the main character’s name in the Ion Maiden game being Shelly Harrison (which the band argues is an attempt to copy the name of Steve Harris, an Iron Maiden founder and primary songwriter).
Iron Maiden is seeking US$2 million in damages, an injunction to stop Ion Maiden from being produced and sold, and destruction of all reproductions of the Iron Maiden trademark.
Commenting on the lawsuit on Twitter, 3D Realms claims that the lawsuit is full of “frivolous claims that anyone who has played Ion Maiden would find over the top”. Some commentators have also argued that the styling of the logos is “vastly different” and that the “game’s music stylings sound nothing like Iron Maiden’s heavy metal work”.
3D Realms has reportedly stated that it will review its options once it has received “official notice of the lawsuit and will make any necessary decisions at the appropriate time”. For the time being, however, the developers have stated that everyone is continuing “to work diligently on Ion Maiden”.
Author: Andrew Patel
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@alxstls
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…