L’Oréal alleges patent infringement against Drunk Elephant
L’Oréal, a multinational beauty products conglomerate and owner of the Skinceuticals brand, has sued an indie competitor, Drunk Elephant, for patent infringement. L’Oréal alleges that Drunk Elephant infringed on its patented formulation of CE Ferulic, a skincare product that is designed to even out skin tone and prevent sun damage and wrinkles, by producing its own version of the product called C-Firma. Drunk Elephant sells this product at less than half the price of L’ Oréal’s CE Ferulic serum.
In the beauty industry, it is common for customers to shop for “dupes”, or more affordable versions of the most expensive beauty products. Drunk Elephant has recently had great success with its products, including C-Firma, and has expanded to Europe and plans to expand to Asia. However, this lawsuit threatens one of its most popular products, as well as the “dupe” industry in general.
It is alleged that Drunk Elephant used the formulation published in the L’Oréal patent to come up with its own product. A L’Oréal USA spokesperson stated that “[w]e believe that the scientific inventions which make our products so innovative are a strategic and competitive advantage and we are committed to protecting our valuable intellectual property.”
With the global beauty product industry being so lucrative, this case will be one to watch as it could have significant impacts on copycat beauty product creators.
Author: Abid Khalild
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@freestocks
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…