As reported by the Montréal Gazette, a judge of the Quebec Superior Court has ruled that Le Journal de Mourréal, a website specializing in fake news stories satirizing actual news coverage, will need to change its name and pay $23,500 for infringing the trademark of Le Journal de Montréal.
Média QMI, a Québecor subsidiary that runs the Journal de Montréal newspaper, sought an injunction to prevent the use of the name by the website’s co-creator, Janick Murray-Hall.
Média QMI argued before the Court that the Le Journal de Mourréal website was eroding the credibility of the newspaper’s brand, using the newspaper’s brand to generate profits, and creating confusion among readers as to what was parody and what was actually reported. It evidenced the website’s logo, which was nearly indistinguishable, phonetically and visually, from its own, as support for the argument that the resemblance between the logos would be likely to cause confusion.
Le Journal de Mourréal, for its part, did not argue that its website did not copy the newspaper’s appearance, but, rather, argued that no one could confuse the two given the website’s satirical tone and nature. Quebec Superior Court Judge Micheline Perrault was unconvinced, ruling that the website “was designed to mimic the general appearance of the publications distributed under the Journal de Montréal trademark.”
Ultimately, Judge Perrault found that Le Journal de Mourréal can be confused with Le Journal de Montréal, and, as a result, there was infringement of the trademark.
Authors: Jaclyn Tilak and Nargis Fazli
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@codzilla_swiss
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…