Lululemon Sues Over Counterfeit Yoga Pants
Canadian athletic apparel giant, Lululemon Athletica Inc. (“Lululemon”), recently filed a lawsuit against California-based Ross Stores Inc. (“Ross”) and one of its suppliers, Impulse Off Price Apparel (“IOPA”), for allegedly selling low-quality, counterfeit versions of its popular leggings.
According to the lawsuit, Ross customers bought the counterfeit leggings for as little as $7.99 each. The items bore Lululemon’s trademarked logo and attached tags that mimic the company’s notable “Designed in Vancouver” tags.
The suit makes claims of trademark infringement, counterfeiting, and unfair competition and cites “evidence of actual consumer confusion”. Ross and IOPA allegedly “distributed and sold at least thousands of counterfeit Lululemon products to consumers and retailers” and were either aware of or wilfully blind to the lack of authenticity of the products. Lululemon claims that, as a result of the counterfeit sales, the goodwill associated with its brand has been significantly harmed.
Lululemon is seeking an order that Ross and IOPA be restrained from counterfeiting Lululemon’s marks, the destruction of any products that infringe on its marks, and damages and profits attributable to the counterfeit sales.
Authors: Larissa Fulop and Nargis Fazli
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@kikekiks
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…