Malaysia’s Intellectual Property High Court has found that companies that sell illicit streaming devices (ISDs) can be civilly liable for copyright infringement. ISDs are devices that allow users to stream pirated content.
ISDs are a major source of concern in Malaysia, with intellectual property professionals concerned that widespread use of these devices will ultimately create a chilling effect on the creative industry as a whole. This development provides another avenue for media companies in Malaysia to protect against infringement of their copyright.
This judgement comes after a campaign by major players in Malaysia’s media and entertainment industry to crack down on digital piracy, claiming that they were not previously sufficiently protected by the current regulations.
While this judgement and the potential new avenue for legal claims will undoubtedly alleviate some of the media companies’ concerns, to further support the media industry, the National Film Development Corporation Malaysia (“FINAS”), has established the Digital Piracy Eradication Committee with the support of law enforcement. FINAS believes that the ultimate solution to digital piracy should include not only civil actions, but increased enforcement of copyright as well.
To that end, Malaysia has laid its first charge of copyright infringement against a company allegedly promoting ISDs. However, it remains to be seen if these strategies will be effective in combatting digital piracy, which accounts for RM 3 billion in losses for the media industry every year.
Author: Mark Leonard
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@esmonde
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…