Microsoft Patent Points to Change in High-End Surface Product Line
A newly-public patent filed by Microsoft suggests that the tech giant may have plans to significantly revamp its flagship line of touchscreen devices.
The Microsoft Surface product line includes a variety of high-end personal touchscreen computers and interactive whiteboards. The new patent suggests that Microsoft is taking steps to improve the ergonomics and aesthetics of its Surface products. Currently, the Surface and Surface Pro lines feature a three-setting “kickstand” device for positioning the display, which can create functionality issues during use on a lap or shallow desk.
The patent application was filed in February 2018 and the patent, titled “Computing Devices, Removal Support Devices and methods of use,” was published on September 7, 2018.
The background to the patent application notes that the increasing popularity of hybrid computers means that the “friction hinge” on a shared edge between the display and keyboard is no longer the default connector system.
For example, an integrated support device may allow users to mount the device to “various removal support devices.” The patent lists a height-adjustable stand or hand straps, such as those used in professional sports settings, as potential support options. Further, in part because the patent states that the invention could allow a display to be inserted into a kiosk, it appears that the patent is aimed at business or retail applications of Surface products.
Some commentators have suggested that the patent shows Microsoft has chosen to abandon the kickstand, a unique feature of the Surface tablet line, in favour of a stand similar to those used with Apple’s iPad product family. To date, Apple has not released a product using an integrated kickstand-style supporting system.
Author: Wes Dutcher-Walls, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@linkedinsalesnavigator
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…