New Jersey Photographer Unsuccessful in Claim Against Social Media Platform
As reported by PetaPixel, New Jersey photographer, Harold Davis, lost the copyright infringement lawsuit he launched against Pinterest in 2019 for allegedly using 51 of his photos on its site without his permission.
Davis argued that Pinterest infringed on his copyright when the site displayed the pictures alongside advertisements as “promoted pins” (paid ads that customers can post to Pinterest), which he claimed constituted unauthorized commercial use of his work. The choice of which pin to promote, and the content of this pin, is at the discretion of the user purchasing the promoted pin, not Pinterest. Davis also challenged Pinterest’s use of his works in emails and push notifications to users.
A US District Judge granted summary judgment in favour of Pinterest on the basis of the safe harbour provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The judge noted that, even if Davis could show Pinterest was making a profit from Davis’s photos, which he failed to do, precedent does not support his position. Individual users (not Pinterest) added Davis’s works to the Pinterest platform; the fact that Pinterest uses algorithms to increase consumer access to content does not make it responsible for any infringement.
Authors: Caitlin Woodford and Taryn Wunder, 2022 Summer Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@prateekkatyal
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…