New Mazda Patents Signal Potential Return of “Wankel” Engine
As reported by Motor1, Mazda has recently published two new filings with the Japanese patent office for updates to its rotary engine (or "Wankel" design), signifying a potential return of Mazda’s production of a car that utilizes the technology. The last car that used the Wankel design was the Mazda RX-8, which used the engine until the vehicle’s production was cancelled in 2011.
In contrast to the standard piston design used in most automobiles (in which the internal combustion in a cylinder forces a piston to rotate the crankshaft), the crankshaft in a rotary engine remains stationary while the cylinders rotate around the unit. As a result, rotary engines operate with less vibration and can produce more power for their size. However, rotary engines are also known to have shorter lifespans and require more maintenance, which makes them less ideal for a standard production vehicle.
Despite these challenges, Mazda appears optimistic about reviving the rotary engine for production. Speaking to Automotive News Europe in June of 2019, Mazda CEO Akira Marumoto stated that, though Mazda has “the dream of seeing one day a vehicle powered by a rotary engine,” the company has had to put the development of such a rotary engine “on the back burner [with] no time frame”.
The recently uncovered patent filings come on the heels of an October 2018 announcement from Mazda that confirmed that their upcoming electric vehicle would contain a Wankel-powered range extending engine.
It is clear that Mazda remains committed to the application of this alternative engine technology, and it will be interesting to observe how Mazda continues to innovate on the path to its “Sustainable Zoom-Zoom 2030” initiative.
Author: Adam Voorberg, 2019 Summer Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@sgcreative
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…