The Dead Rabbit is a New York City bar consistently ranked among the world’s best. According to Bleeding Cool, Dead Rabbit is known for using specially-created comic books as menus and even recently released a “recipe comic book”.
As reported by The Outhousers, a lawsuit was recently filed by DRT LLC, the company which owns the popular New York bar, against Image Comics and Forbidden Planet for $2 million each. At issue is Image Comics’ and Forbidden Planet’s alleged infringement of the trademark “Dead Rabbit” which is held by DRT LLC. This trademark covers “comic books,[…] fiction and non-fiction books on various topics, [...] and recipe books.”
In October, Image Comics published a comic book, written by Gerry Duggan and John McCrea, entitled “Dead Rabbit.”
Shortly after its publication, DRT’s lawyers sent a Cease and Desist letter to both Image Comics and Forbidden Planet asking that the publishing, distribution and marketing of the Dead Rabbit comic book stop immediately. The second issue of the Dead Rabbit comic book was released in the first week of November, but, later that same month, after the lawsuit was filed by DRT LLC, Image Comics issued a mandatory product recall of the first two issues of the comic book. A search for the Dead Rabbit comic on the Forbidden Planet website reveals that the series has been discontinued and is no longer available for purchase. Comicbook.com reported that, prior to the halt in sales of the comic books, they had been well-reviewed.
It is possible that Image Comics and Forbidden Planet will make some revisions to the comic book series to address any trademark infringement issues and re-introduce the series to its market of fans eagerly awaiting the arrival of the third issue.
Author: Alexandra Murray
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@dreamcatchlight
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…