New Zealand Honey Producers Apply to Trademark Name “Manuka” in China
The New Zealand government has pledged NZ$5.7 million (CAD$4.79 million) to the New Zealand Manuka Honey Appellation Society (NZMHAS) to help the country’s honey producers trademark the name “manuka” in China. The NZMHAS is set to apply to the Beijing Intellectual Property Court in its bid to trademark the name.
Manuka is a Maori name for the Leptospermum scoparium trees, which produce the honey. Manuka is advertised as having health benefits, which makes it popular among Chinese consumers. The registration of “manuka honey” in favour of NZMHAS as a certification trademark in China would effectively shut Australian manuka honey producers out of the market, potentially costing them hundreds of millions of dollars in sales. The chairman of the Australian Manuka Honey Association has called on the Australian government to intervene, stating that it is a major trade issue for the country and setting up the countries for a protracted battle.
The NZMHAS has already applied for certification marks in the United Kingdom and the United States. In December 2017, the United Kingdom Intellectual Property Office decided in favour of MHAS for the grant of the certification trademark for Manuka Honey in the United Kingdom, but the Australian Manuka Honey Association is in the process of challenging this trademark. The United States Intellectual Property Office has rejected the NZMHAS trademark application.
Author: Matt McDonald
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@danika_anya
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…