Piracy on Piracy: Supreme Court Hears Case regarding Copyright in Images of Blackbeard’s Ship
Documentarian Frederick Allen has brought a lawsuit against the state of North Carolina for copyright infringement, which has recently made its way to the Supreme Court. Allen alleges that his photos of the Queen Anne’s Revenge, the ship of the infamous Captain Blackbeard, were improperly used on the Cultural Affairs Department’s website.
While North Carolina had entered into contracts with Allen’s employer that allowed the state to publish some of his works, Allen criticized North Carolina for posting too much material and neglecting to include a watermark and time stamp. In response, the North Carolina legislature passed “Blackbeard’s Law”, which allows the state to use any materials documenting the Queen Anne’s Revenge. Allen then pursued this infringement lawsuit.
Counsel for North Carolina originally argued that a state government was immune from an action for infringement. While the Federal Appeals Court agreed, the Supreme Court questioned whether immunity would unfairly and disproportionately benefit the state while individuals would still be liable for infringement. North Carolina countered by arguing that the proper remedy against a state government in this case should be a court injunction rather than damages.
If North Carolina is found liable for damages, taxpayers throughout the state would suffer as the resources available to them would lose funding. Indeed, as “deeply troubling” as Justice Sotomayer of the Supreme Court found Blackbeard’s Law, she cited precedent for state immunity from patent actions dating from the 1999 Florida Prepaid case.
The Court has yet to release its decision on the matter at the time of writing.
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@arstyy
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…