Plaintiff who sued Macklemore and Lewis ordered to pay their legal fees
A Louisiana federal court has ordered jazz musician Paul Batiste to pay $125,000 to Macklemore and Ryan Lewis for their legal fees. Batiste filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in respect of several songs released by the duo, including “Thrift Shop”, which was dismissed earlier this year.
As reported by CMU, in 2017, Batiste sued Macklemore and Lewis alleging that the duo had used various melodies and elements from his earlier tracks. Specifically, Batiste claimed that they stole beats and horn melodies from his songs “Hip Jazz” and “World of Blues”.
U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman called the lawsuit “objectively baseless” and found that there was no evidence that Macklemore and Lewis had ever heard Batiste’s songs (released in 1997 and 2000 respectively). Justice Feldman compared each of Batiste’s songs to the defendants’ allegedly infringing work and received insights from expert musicologists. He concluded that Batiste failed to demonstrate striking similarity or any instances of sampling.
Macklemore and Lewis recently returned to court, arguing that Batiste should contribute toward their legal costs because of the weakness of his case. Demonstrating the dangers of bringing “objectively baseless” claims, the Court granted the defendants a $125,000 costs award, which was just shy of the $150,000 they had requested.
Photo Credit: Josh Appel on Unsplash
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Browsing for Trouble? Intuit Defends Synchronized Browser Patent Infringement Claim
Intuit Inc. (“Intuit”), the owner of accounting software, TurboTax, has reportedly successfully defended against a claim alleging that TurboTax’s co-browsing feature infringes a patent owned by… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CanLII and Caseway Reportedly Settle AI Copyright Dispute
As recently reported by Canadian Lawyer Magazine, CanLII has settled its copyright infringement action against AI-powered legal assistant, Caseway AI. The terms of the settlement are confidential, but… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Cut, Sew, but Don’t Sell: South Korea’s Supreme Court Clarifies Trademark Limits
As recently reported by Korea JoongAng Daily, South Korea’s Supreme Court (second division) has issued its first decision regarding whether “upcycling” or customizing branded luxury goods can amount… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a…