Plaintiff who sued Macklemore and Lewis ordered to pay their legal fees
A Louisiana federal court has ordered jazz musician Paul Batiste to pay $125,000 to Macklemore and Ryan Lewis for their legal fees. Batiste filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in respect of several songs released by the duo, including “Thrift Shop”, which was dismissed earlier this year.
As reported by CMU, in 2017, Batiste sued Macklemore and Lewis alleging that the duo had used various melodies and elements from his earlier tracks. Specifically, Batiste claimed that they stole beats and horn melodies from his songs “Hip Jazz” and “World of Blues”.
U.S. District Judge Martin Feldman called the lawsuit “objectively baseless” and found that there was no evidence that Macklemore and Lewis had ever heard Batiste’s songs (released in 1997 and 2000 respectively). Justice Feldman compared each of Batiste’s songs to the defendants’ allegedly infringing work and received insights from expert musicologists. He concluded that Batiste failed to demonstrate striking similarity or any instances of sampling.
Macklemore and Lewis recently returned to court, arguing that Batiste should contribute toward their legal costs because of the weakness of his case. Demonstrating the dangers of bringing “objectively baseless” claims, the Court granted the defendants a $125,000 costs award, which was just shy of the $150,000 they had requested.
Photo Credit: Josh Appel on Unsplash
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…