Recycling Old Patents Holds Value
As reported in Industry Week, companies looking to advance new technologies would do well to research old patents and previously published applications for a myriad of reasons.
For one, this research can reveal what others have developed and disclosed in their patents and patent applications, helping companies to avoid potential patent infringement. In addition, old patents can provide intel as to who the competitors in any given area might be. Consequently, companies can weigh whether to attempt to pursue licensing agreements with certain parties in possession of a valid patent instead of investing a great deal of time, effort, and expense into new R&D themselves. Finally, researching old patents and published applications is a good way to learn what has not already been developed and disclosed. This, in turn, can help direct R&D efforts.
Researching the status of a U.S. patent is easy to do – not only does the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) website offer search capabilities, so too do other resources like Google Patents. These platforms offer keyword searches and will indicate whether a patent has reached the end of its term and has therefore expired.
This can be incredibly useful for companies – once expired, a patent enters the public domain and all rights previously held by the patent-owner and any licensees are extinguished. This means that the patent becomes freely available for public use. That said, it is important for companies availing themselves of an expired patent to note that they must stay within the confines of the scope of the patent. In other words, they cannot add to or otherwise modify the expired patent in order to avoid the unintended infringement of a wholly separate patent that may still be in effect.
Author: Anna Condon, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@fahrulazmi
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…