Roku Resumes Mexico Sales after Copyright Victory
After a year-long battle, the 11th Collegiate Court in Mexico City overturned a previous ruling that forced Roku, a company that sells devices enabling customers to stream TV content, to cease sales within Mexico due to concerns over piracy.
The issue first arose when Cablevision, the cable TV operator owned by Mexican media giant Televisa, sued Roku alleging the company’s devices were being hacked through its “private channels” option, allowing users to watch pirated channels. This allowed Roku to benefit from these channels and their popularity, and turn a blind eye to the piracy issue. Roku denied these claims and argued it had not enabled the distribution of pirated content and, in fact, took down the pirated channels once discovered.
The Superior Court of Justice of the City of Mexico issued an order that prevented the importation of Roku devices and prohibited stores, such as Amazon and Sears, from offering them for sale. Roku appealed the ban, which was overturned by a federal judge. However, on June 28, 2017, a Mexico City Tribunal upheld the previous ban. Roku appealed several times, but did not succeed.
After the original ban in June 2017, Roku took more aggressive measures to crack down on the piracy by increasing the number of warnings informing its customers that channels have to abide by its terms and distribute legal content. Some channels exited Roku on their own, and some were removed by the company. Earlier this year, the company announced that following more aggressive anti-piracy policies, 99.5 percent of all streamlining time on the platform worldwide was spent on legitimate, legal channels.
The 11th Collegiate Court in Mexico City has now found the original ban to have been incorrect and that the Roku device is not illegal. The Court acknowledged Roku’s efforts to keep pirated content off the service. The original complainant, Cablevision, warned it would take further legal action to have any future pirated channels blocked via the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property and other local authorities.
Roku’s general counsel Stephen Kay said: "Today’s decision is an important victory for Roku and its Mexican distributor, Latamel Distribuidora, S. de R.L. de C.V. and Mexican retailers in the legal battle against an improper ban on sales of its popular streaming players in Mexico. We are pleased with the Collegiate Court’s decision and look forward to continuing to build Roku’s TV streaming business in Mexico."
The company announced it will restart its sales in Mexico.
Author: Abid Khalid
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@dbeamer_jpg
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…