‘Samsung Coin’ Trademark Application Filed – But Not by Samsung
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (“Samsung”) has been making rapid inroads into the blockchain sector with plans to develop and issue its own cryptocurrency. This made it all the more surprising when Samsung revealed it was not behind the “Samsung Coin” trademark application filed with the Korean Intellectual Property Office (“KIPO”) on July 10.
First reported by CoinDesk, the KIPO filing lists an individual named Kim Nam-jin (“Kim”) as the applicant. Kim is apparently not associated with Samsung. When reached for comment, a Samsung representative rejected any affiliation with Kim, stating “We don’t work this way.”
Although not much is known about Kim, he has reportedly filed other trademark applications that closely track cryptocurrency developments by other tech industry giants. The KIPO database shows that Kim also filed an application on July 10 seeking to trademark “ThinQ Wallet”.
The KIPO filing does not explicitly state that the “Samsung Coin” trademark is to be used for cryptocurrency, but it does say it is to be used for a “downloadable electronic money computer program” and an “electronic money card.”
Authors: Larissa Fulop and Spencer Paveck, 2019 Summer Student-at-law
Photo Credits: https://unsplash.com/@kharp
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…