To put it bluntly, Potify is too similar to Spotify. That was what the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board held when it refused to register the trademark Potify as an app for cannabis dispensaries.
Spotify, the streaming giant, argued that the Potify brand dilutes the Spotify brand by association. As reported by EDMTunes, Spotify successfully established that Potify was “blurring and tarnishing” the former’s brand. The Board found that the only difference between the two marks was the “S” at the beginning of Spotify.
The CEO of Potify denied any association, claiming “the Spotify name did not come to mind when developing the name.” The Potify app connects users to local dispensaries for cannabis delivery.
The Board did not find that any association between to the two companies had or will occur. Nevertheless, because of the similarity in look, sound, structure, cadence, and essential nature of the marks, the Board did not discount the possibility that an association would occur.
Authors: Jaclyn Tilak and Hannah Johnson, 2021/2022 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@daconja
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…