Throwing Out the Son with the Sink Water
George Sink Sr., a well-known personal injury lawyer from South Carolina, successfully obtained a trademark infringement injunction against his son, George Sink Jr., preventing him from using his own name for his law firm. The elder Sink trademarked the name of his law firm, “George Sink, P.A. Injury Lawyers”.
The claim notes that the younger Sink has always gone by “Ted” and alleges that he is trying to capitalize on his father’s reputation and advertising dollars. In response, Sink Jr. claims that his father actively promoted him as George Sink Jr. in television advertising and on business cards before his termination from the firm in February 2019. Since Sink Jr.’s departure and attempted use of the name for his new firm, Sink Sr. claims that his son is causing confusion and harming his firm’s business, goodwill, and reputation.
In an August 2019 decision, Judge David Norton issued a temporary restraining order preventing Sink Jr. from using “George Sink,” “George Sink II Law Firm,” and “George Sink Law Firm” as his firm name, professional email address, website address, and any other marketing materials. Judge Norton wrote that, “the mere fact that it is George Sink Jr.’s given name does not automatically shield him from allegations of infringement.”
The injunction is pending a final ruling by an arbitrator. Sink Jr. recently filed a notice of appeal.
Author: Meg King
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@sabine_van_straaten
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…