Tim Hortons May Protect Trademark After Imitator Discovered in India
Canadian coffee and baked goods chain Tim Hortons is reportedly considering legal action after becoming aware of an imitator café called “Tim Hottens” operating in Yamunanagar, India. A Tim Hortons spokesperson has reportedly stated that the company may take steps to shut down the imitator’s business.
Clearly, Tim Hottens bears a name similar to the Canadian brand. In addition, the Indian café features a similar font and logo on its sign, and uses Tim Hortons’ iconic “always fresh” slogan. One commentator has called Tim Hottens a “wholesale ripoff.”
Based on photos posted to the café’s Facebook page, it appears that Tim Hottens’ interior design and menu differ from the Canadian original. The imitator establishment features a darker, nightclub-style interior design, with waiters providing table service, and its menu includes burgers and alcohol, unlike the quick-service coffee-shop business model of Tim Hortons.
Based on Tim Hottens Facebook posts, it appears that it may have been in operation since early 2016. Facebook users generally gave the café favourable reviews, with an average of 4.6 stars out of 5.
Tim Hortons has operated in Canada since 1964, and now boasts over 4,500 locations worldwide, the vast majority of which are in Canada. The company operates on a franchising business model.
Tim Hortons has faced similar incidents of brand imitation and potential trademark infringement in the past. In 2015, Canadian expats in South Korea spotted a café bearing the name “Tim House,” in font similar to the original logo, as well as “Tim Mortons” coffee being sold in a Korean market. Tim Hortons does not currently operate in South Korea.
Under Canada’s intellectual property regime, a trademark is a “combination of letters, words, sounds or designs that distinguishes one company’s goods or services from those of others in the marketplace.” Trademark protection, granted for renewable 15-year terms, is one method for businesses to preserve and profit from their corporate reputation and image.
A spokesperson for Tim Hortons’ parent company, Restaurant Brands International, reportedly stated that their concerns over the Tim Hottens imitator related to protecting perceptions of Tim Hortons’ quality and brand.
Author: Wes Dutcher-Walls, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@nate_dumlao
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…