US Appeals Court: Supertramp Songwriter Must "Give a Little Bit"
As reported by Reuters, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Roger Hodgson, the former Supertramp singer and songwriter, must compensate three former band members for a share of songwriting profits.
The dispute dates back to a 1977 agreement (the “Agreement”) between Hodgson and three other band members, who had agreed to share royalties generated by hit songs, including “Breakfast in America”, “Give a Little Bit”, and “The Logical Song”.
In a decision that made reference to the band’s famous lyrics, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals analyzed the Agreement and found that Hodgson must continue to "Give a Little Bit" of Supertramp’s royalty revenue, for as long as the songs continue to receive royalties. The Plaintiffs, John Helliwell, Robert Siebenberg and Douglas Thomson, were seeking $1.3 million in outstanding royalty payments, dating back to 2018, when Hodgson stopped making payments to them.
The ruling follows a lower court decision that sided with Hodgson, who argued that the royalties did not exist in perpetuity and could be cancelled after a “reasonable time”.
Authors: Arash Rouhi, Kelly Zhang, and Jack Borins, 2025/2026 Articling Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@jefflssantos
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CIPO Explores Fast-Tracking Patents for Innovation in Priority Sectors
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly is reportedly evaluating a proposal from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) that would accelerate patent applications in artificial intelligence…