According to the BBC, prominent fast fashion retailer Zara is currently in a legal battle with a small business owner, claiming that the business, House of Zana (a UK-based womenswear brand), is “conceptually identical” to Zara’s business and that there is a “high degree of visual and oral similarities” between the two.
Zara reportedly submitted to a tribunal that House of Zana’s trademark application should be refused because the business’s name is too similar to Zara, and may cause confusion of the two brands amongst consumers. Zara claims that the word Zana is merely “one small brush mark” away from the word Zara. Further, they argue “House of” is a common term used in the fashion industry when referring to designers and brands, and does not make the name distinctive from Zara.
However, House of Zana owner, Amber Kotrri, has reportedly argued that her brand has never been called anything other than “House of Zana” and that Zara’s claim therefore ignores the fact that the brand as a whole has never been known as “Zana”. In fact, all of Kotrri’s social media and branding efforts reportedly refer to the brand as such or by the acronym “HOZ”.
Kotrri notes that Zara has not proven that consumers find the name of her business misleading and that Zara is an established global brand which customers can easily distinguish from her own.
Authors: Caitlin Woodford and Taryn Wunder, 2022 Summer Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@hannahmorgan7
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…