Tattooed celebrities are abundant; from Shawn Mendes’s fan-designed butterfly, to Drake’s “6 God” praying hands, to the elaborate artwork displayed on the bodies of professional athletes like basketball star LeBron James (by one account more than half of all active NBA players have tattoos) — the list goes on. Whether it’s angels or demons, expressions of faith, or names of family and friends who’ve been loved or lost, there’s no doubt a celebrity’s body art is an integral part of their personal brand, appearance and public identity.
It may be surprising to some that tattoo art, like other forms of art, is capable of attracting copyright protection. In Canada and the U.S., if a tattoo is an original work of art (not copied), is fixed in any tangible medium (e.g., inked on skin), and is not in the public domain, then it qualifies for copyright protection. Although there has been some legal debate as to whether the human body is considered a “fixed medium” for copyright law purposes, generally speaking, and as noted by the U.S. federal court in Whitmill v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (the case that dealt with Mike Tyson’s tattoo in The Hangover movie), “[o]f course tattoos can be copyrighted … I don’t think there is any reasonable dispute about that.”
Since copyright laws generally grant the owners of artistic works the sole right to control the use and reproduction of their works in all media (subject to some limited exceptions, including those noted below), any unauthorized use or reproduction of a celebrity’s tattoo in an e-sports game (e.g., NBA 2K20), movie (e.g., The Hangover), or other media may result in a copyright infringement claim — not to mention a trademark, publicity or personality rights claim, depending on the circumstances.
When it comes to video games specifically, tattoo artists have sued celebrity athletes and game publishers for reproducing the tattoos of, for example, former NFL player Ricky Williams in the Electronic Arts’s sports title, NFL Street, and welterweight fighter Carlos Condit in the THQ game UFC Undisputed 3.
In the Solid Oak Sketches, LLC v. Visual Concepts, LLC et al. case (originally filed in 2016 but still making its way through the U.S. courts), at issue is Take-Two Interactive’s unauthorized reproduction of the tattoos of NBA stars, LeBron James, Stephen Curry, Kenyon Martin, DeAndre Jordan, Eric Bledsoe and late basketball legend Kobe Bryant in its NBA 2K video games. Solid Oak claims it purchased the exclusive reproduction rights from the original tattoo artists and never gave permission to Take-Two to digitally reproduce, distribute, or display the NBA stars’ tattoos in the games.
Take-Two argues its use of the tattoos was de minimis since the tattoos were not prominently featured in the game, which also includes 400 other NBA players. And, in any event, Take-Two says its use of the images should qualify as “fair use” since it would be impossible to realistically portray the individual NBA players unless their video game avatars capture their distinct tattoos and uniquely personal body art.
Interestingly, Take-Two relies in part on a declaration of support filed by James stating he personally contributed to the creative design of his tattoos, his tattoos are part of his “persona and identity,” and any reproduction of his image without his tattoos is not really a depiction of him. James reasoned that any use of his image, without his tattoos, undermines his publicity rights and deprives him of the right to license (and control) his own body and what he looks like as both a private person and a public basketball player.
James’s declaration raises some fascinating legal issues. Is he a “joint author” of his tattoos? Were his tattoos created as “works-made-for-hire” so that under U.S. copyright law James would be deemed the author and owner of the tattoos? Alternatively, does he have an “implied licence” to use his tattoos any way he wants? What about his right to protect his personal liberty and freedom of expression?
As fascinating or frustrating as these issues may be (depending on your standpoint), avoiding this legal complexity with a reliable degree of certainty is simpler than it may seem.
Obtaining the necessary rights and releases from those who own, create, collaborate on or display tattoos can be as simple as selecting a few carefully crafted sentences and ensuring the parties “get it in writing.” For example, instead of relying on de minimis and fair use defences, a game publisher could license the necessary rights to reproduce the tattoos from the tattoo rights holder to help alleviate this uncertainty.
Similarly, a licence or release from a tattoo artist in favour of a celebrity athlete could simply state: (i) the tattoo is original (not copied), (ii) the artist owns or controls all rights (including copyrights) in the tattoo, (iii) the celebrity is allowed to use and reproduce the tattoo in any manner or media without restriction, and (iv) the artist waives all so-called “moral rights” in the tattoo. The waiver of moral rights is important as it will give the celebrity the flexibility to modify, enhance or remove the tattoo altogether, with or without crediting the original tattoo artist.
In the wake of the recent ink cases and as body art continues to become more mainstream, celebrities — and anyone who licenses or makes commercial use of their images — should take legal precautions to protect their interests in the celebrity’s personal brand and likeness, especially when pre-emptive and preventative action can be as simple as noted above.
The author would like to thank Yonca Osborne, Associate, and Jordyn Benattar, Articling Student-at-Law, for their assistance in preparing this Update.
This article was previously published by The Lawyer’s Daily (www.thelawyersdaily.ca) a division of LexisNexis.ca.
Expertise
Authors
Insights
-
Entertainment
So You Want To Produce In Canada, Eh?
If you are considering producing in Canada, there’s a lot you not only need to know, but want to know. Why? Because it can save you both time and money - and who doesn’t want that? The discussion… -
Entertainment
CRTC Announces Three-Phased Public Consultation Plan to Implement the Online Streaming Act in Canada
On May 8, 2023, the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) unveiled its three-phased regulatory plan (the “Regulatory Plan”) to consult with the public to implement the… -
Entertainment
The Online Streaming Act: Canada Passes New Legislation to Regulate Online Streaming Services
On April 27, 2023, Bill C-11, titled the Online Streaming Act (the “Act”), was passed by the Canadian Senate and received Royal Assent, officially becoming law in Canada. The Act is designed to… -
Technology
U.S. District Court Finds NBA Top Shot Moments may be Subject to U.S. Securities Laws
On May 12, 2021, a class action law suit was filed against Dapper Labs, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) alleging that Dapper Labs violated U.S… -
Entertainment
Canada Extends Basic Term of Copyright Protection To “Life of Author Plus 70 Years” Starting December 30, 2022
On November 17, 2022, the Government of Canada published an Order in Council to bring into force recent amendments to Canada’s Copyright Act (the “ Act”) which extend the basic term of copyright… -
Entertainment
Canada to Increase Copyright Term to “Life Plus Seventy Years”
On June 23, 2022, Royal Assent was granted to Bill C-191, an omnibus bill that implements significant amendments to the Canadian Copyright Act (the “Act”). In particular, the legislative…
Featured Work
-
Entertainment
Representing Shaftesbury Inc.
Goodmans LLP represents Shaftesbury Inc., a leading Canadian producer of scripted productions including the well-known and popular TV programs “Murdoch Mysteries," “Frankie Drake Mysteries," “Hudson… -
Entertainment
Launch of Blink49 Studios Inc.
Goodmans LLP acts for Blink49 Studios, a new Canadian-controlled studio venture backed by Endeavor Content… -
Entertainment
Amazon Prime Video Productions Filmed in Canada
Goodmans LLP provides ongoing advice to Amazon Studios re: productions produced or post-produced in Canada which stream on Amazon Prime Video… -
Entertainment
Insight Productions Advice and Legal Counsel
Goodmans LLP has provided legal advice in connection to Canadian production laws, financing of feature films and acted as counsel to Insight Productions - one of Canada's foremost production companies… -
Capital Markets
Boat Rocker Media Completes IPO Raising Gross Proceeds of $170.1 Million
Goodmans LLP acted as legal counsel to the underwriters (RBC Capital Markets and TD Securities Inc.) in connection with Boat Rocker Media Inc.’s (“Boat Rocker Media” or the “Company”) initial public… -
Entertainment
Alcon Entertainment Successfully Produces Six Seasons Series - “The Expanse”
Goodmans LLP represents Alcon Entertainment in connection with its production legal services on all six seasons of the series entitled “The Expanse” filmed in Canada (originally broadcast on SyFy and…
News & Events
-
Mergers and Acquisitions
Chambers and Partners Continues to Honour Goodmans with Top-Tier Recognition
We are delighted to announce Goodmans LLP has once again received top-tier recognition from Chambers and Partners in the Chambers Canada 2024 Guide released today. Recognition from… -
- 01:30 PM Entertainment
Tara Parker at BHBA's Webinar: What You Need To Know About Film/TV Production in Canada
Join Tara Parker on Wednesday, June 21, 2023 at 12:30 pm for the Beverly Hills Bar Association's webinar: What You Need To Know About Film/TV Production in Canada.For more information, click… -
- 08:00 PM Entertainment
Tara Parker at the Women in Arts and Entertainment Law Series- Women in Film
Join Tara Parker at the Women in Film Law session on March 22nd, the second installment of the Women in Arts and Entertainment Law series, hosted by the University of Detroit Mercy School of…