Supreme Court of Canada Provides Guidance on the Government’s Duty to Consult
On July 26, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released two decisions that clarify the Crown’s duty to consult the aboriginal peoples of Canada if their Aboriginal or treaty rights may be impacted. The first decision relates to the Inuit of Clyde River in Nunavut regarding the National Energy Board's (NEB) authorization of seismic testing off Baffin Islandi and the second decision relates to the Chippewas of the Thames First Nation in Ontario regarding the NEB’s decision to permit modification of an existing pipeline that crosses their traditional territoryii. The Indigenous groups argued that the NEB process failed to fulfil the Crown's duty to consult and to accommodate their concerns.
The two decisions include important clarifications regarding the duty to consult:
- Although the NEB is an independent tribunal, it has the final decision making authority regarding these matters and therefore its decisions are themselves Crown conduct. If these decisions could potentially adversely impact Aboriginal and treaty rights, the Crown duty to consult is implicated. “The Crown’s constitutional obligation does not disappear when the Crown acts to approve a project through a regulatory body such as the NEB”.
- The Crown may rely on steps taken by an administrative body to fulfill some or all of its duty to consult, provided the administrative body has the power to conduct the consultation and to determine appropriate accommodation. This is the case even when the government is not a party in the administrative proceedings.
- If the Crown intends to rely on an administrative body to carry out its duty to consult, it must be made clear to the affected Indigenous groups that it is doing so.
The Court underscored the importance of evaluating the impact of a project, not simply on the environment – through an environmental assessment – but on the Aboriginal and treaty rights being asserted. The Court held: “The duty to consult is not triggered by historical impacts. It is not the vehicle to address historical grievances. . . The subject of the consultation is the impact on the claimed rights of the current decision under consideration”.
In evaluating whether the duty to consult is adequately undertaken, the SCC confirmed that there is a spectrum of intensity of consultation requirements. Citing its decision in Haida Nation v British Columbia (Minister of Forests)iii, the Court noted that “deep consultation” is required “where a strong prima facie case for the claim is established, the right and potential infringement is of high significance to the Aboriginal peoples, and the risk of non-compensable damage is high”. The critical balancing of these factors is a continued theme in recent SCC decisions on the Crown duty to consult.
These decisions tell us that the consultation process does not provide a veto; it is a critical foundational process and “a regulatory decision made on the basis of inadequate consultation will not satisfy constitutional standards and should be quashed.”
i Clyde River (Hamlet) v. Petroleum Geo-Services Inc., 2017 SCC 40.
ii Chippewas of the Thames First Nation v. Enbridge Pipelines Inc., 2017 SCC 41.
iii 2004 SCC 73.
Expertise
Insights
-
Environmental
Supreme Court of Canada Holds Designated Projects Scheme Under the Impact Assessment Act is Unconstitutional
On October 13, 2023, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its advisory decision regarding the constitutionality of the federal government’s environmental assessment (EA) regime in Reference re… -
Cleantech
Province of Ontario Proposes Establishment of a Clean Energy Credit Registry
On August 2, 2022, Ontario’s Ministry of Energy released its proposal for a clean energy credit registry (the “Registry”) for public comment on the Environmental Registry of Ontario (ERO). The… -
Cleantech
Canada's First Patent Collective Launches for the Cleantech Sector
Over the last several years, the federal government has touted its $85 million Intellectual Property Strategy (IP Strategy). One of the key pillars of the IP Strategy is $30 million in funding for… -
Cleantech
Government of Canada Publishes Revised Proposal for Greenhouse Gas Offset System
On July 2, 2020, the federal government published a discussion paper entitled Carbon Pollution Pricing: Considerations for Protocol Development in the Federal Greenhouse Offset System (the “Proposal… -
Cleantech
Federal and Ontario Updates on Climate Change and Clean Growth Plans
Beginning this month (January 2019), the federal Output-Based Pricing System (OBPS) for large emitters will apply in Ontario and other jurisdictions that had not met the federal carbon pricing… -
Cleantech
Ontario Introduces Bill to Cancel Cap and Trade and Launches Carbon Tax Case
On July 25, the Honourable Rod Phillips, Minister of Environment, Conservation and Parks (the “Minister”), introduced Bill 4: Cap and Trade Cancellation Act, 2018, (the “Proposed Act”). The Proposed…
Featured Work
-
Mergers and Acquisitions
Chord Energy and Enerplus to combine in $11 billion transaction
Goodmans LLP is acting as Canadian counsel for Chord Energy Corporation in connection with its agreement to buy Enerplus Corporation for US$3.7 billion in stock and cash, creating a leading producer… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Brookfield Renewable and Cameco acquire Westinghouse Electric Company
Goodmans LLP acted for the independent directors of Brookfield Renewable Partners (“Brookfield”) in connection with the acquisition by Brookfield, along with Cameco Corporation and Brookfield’s… -
Real Estate
Forum Subterra – ongoing advice
Goodmans LLP represents Forum Subterra Limited Partnership in connection with various acquisitions, developments and financings of geothermal systems serving high-rise residential condominiums in… -
Capital Markets
Brookfield Renewable Partners $400 million Medium-Term Note Offering
Goodmans LLP acted for a syndicate of agents led by BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc., on the sale by Brookfield Renewable of C$400 million aggregate principal amount of medium-term notes, Series 15, due… -
Shareholder Activism
Horizon Partners opposes TransGlobe Energy Corporation's merger with VAALCO Energy, Inc.
Goodmans LLP acted for Horizon Partners in connection with TransGlobe Energy Corporation merger with VAALCO Energy, Inc… -
Restructuring
Sherritt International Corporation Completes $90 Million Notes Purchase Transaction
Goodmans LLP represented Sherritt International Corporation in its $90 Million Notes Purchase Transaction Pursuant to Oversubscribed Offers…
News & Events
-
Energy
Goodmans Recognized in the Lexpert Special Edition: Energy 2023
We are delighted to announce that the Lexpert Special Edition: Energy has recognized 6 Goodmans lawyers among Canada's top-ranked experts in the energy industry.The Goodmans lawyers named in… -
Restructuring
IFLR1000 2023 Recognizes Goodmans Lawyers and Practices
We are proud to announce Goodmans continues to be recognized by IFLR1000 in its annual guide. Recognition in IFLR1000 is based on a combination of in-depth qualitative research and… -
Environmental
Goodmans Welcomes Joanna Rosengarten
Goodmans is pleased to announce that Joanna Rosengarten has joined the firm as counsel in our Environmental Group. Joanna has a wealth of knowledge and expertise on a broad range of environmental…