
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.
In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York, the Carnegie Hall Corporation alleged that the defendants “trade off of Carnegie Hall’s strong brand, reputation and goodwill, and are likely to confuse consumers and dilute Carnegie Hall’s valuable trademarks.” Carnegie Hall specifically takes issue with the restaurants featuring wall-size murals of the Carnegie Hall building and stage, as well as selling T-shirts and other merchandise associated with the venue and its historic events.
The complaint explicitly names the individual defendant, Efstathios Antonakopolous, as the owner and operator of the defendant corporation and the individual defendant restaurants and references an interview with Antonakopoulos, where he reportedly indicated that Carnegie Diner was inspired by “an idea to pay homage to Carnegie Hall”. In response, the complaint asserts, “[t]his is no ‘homage;’ it is theft”.
The complaint seeks various forms of relief, including monetary damages, permanent injunctive relief, an accounting and disgorgement of the defendants’ profits, destruction of all materials, including the infringing marks, and punitive damages.
Authors: Ayesha Khanna and Rebecca Bruni, 2025 Summer Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@poloska25
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carnegie Hall Takes Trademark Center Stage in Legal Battle
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court Reaffirms Importance of Viva Voce Testimony
In McCain Foods Limited v. J.R. Simplot Company 2024 FC 1729, the Federal Court considered the circumstances in which an examination for discovery of a person, other than a person examined under Rule… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Salt‑N‑Pepa Wage Legal Battle to Reclaim Their Recordings
Salt-N-Pepa are reportedly suing their record label, Universal Music Group (“UMG”), to attempt to reclaim rights to their music, including hip-hop staples “Shoop” and “Push It”. As reported by the New…