Veteran rock photographer, Neil Zlozower, reportedly sued the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame for allegedly using his copyrighted images of Eddie Van Halen in its museum exhibits without his permission and without providing appropriate photo credits in the displays.
The United States District Court ruled that the fair use doctrine protected the museum’s use of the photo. In the United States, the fair use doctrine provides legal protection where copyrighted material is used for a “transformative” purpose – i.e., it has been altered for comment, criticism, or parody. Although the museum reproduced the photographs almost exactly, the judge found that their new use was transformative, as the images served a fundamentally different purpose.
Zlozower’s original photograph was initially used to promote Van Halen and display the band’s fun-loving nature. However, the purpose of the museum’s use of the photo was to educate the public about the history of rock and roll and to demonstrate Van Halen’s influence in the industry. By situating the images within curated historical exhibits, the museum effectively converted the photographs from commercial promotional material into cultural and historical artifacts. As a result, the museum’s display of the photographs was deemed fair use.
This decision underscores the fair use doctrine's defensive capabilities. Even where copyrighted works are copied exactly, the court’s decision reinforces that the underlying purpose may guide its analysis.
Authors: Ayesha Khanna and Josephine Hu, 2025/2026 Articling Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@diane_soko
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@diane_soko
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Rock History and Copyright: The Show Goes On
Veteran rock photographer, Neil Zlozower, reportedly sued the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame for allegedly using his copyrighted images of Eddie Van Halen in its museum exhibits without his permission… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Patent Reinstatement Throws “Glory” Cherries in the Pits
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington (“District Court”) reportedly reinstated the Canadian government’s patent for the “Staccato” cherry, developed by Agriculture and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Sportswear Brand Sues University Over Similarities in Merchandise
As reported by the Associated Press, Columbia Sportswear has sued Columbia University, claiming that the university infringed the sportswear company’s trademark and breached an agreement between the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Call Dropped: Verizon Cuts Deal in $175M Patent Clash
Verizon and Headwater Research LLC have reportedly agreed to settle a patent infringement lawsuit that ended with a $175 million USD jury verdict against the telecom giant. Headwater, a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Nintendo Secures Copyright Victory in China
In a recent copyright infringement case, the Jiangsu High Court ruled in favor of Nintendo, awarding the company approximately $28,000 USD, or 200,000 RMB, and an injunction against an unnamed… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Regulatory Updates – Impacts of Global Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals
Recent tariff measures affecting pharmaceutical products and ingredients have introduced new compliance and cost considerations for manufacturers, distributors, and importers operating in Canada and…