Veteran rock photographer, Neil Zlozower, reportedly sued the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame for allegedly using his copyrighted images of Eddie Van Halen in its museum exhibits without his permission and without providing appropriate photo credits in the displays.
The United States District Court ruled that the fair use doctrine protected the museum’s use of the photo. In the United States, the fair use doctrine provides legal protection where copyrighted material is used for a “transformative” purpose – i.e., it has been altered for comment, criticism, or parody. Although the museum reproduced the photographs almost exactly, the judge found that their new use was transformative, as the images served a fundamentally different purpose.
Zlozower’s original photograph was initially used to promote Van Halen and display the band’s fun-loving nature. However, the purpose of the museum’s use of the photo was to educate the public about the history of rock and roll and to demonstrate Van Halen’s influence in the industry. By situating the images within curated historical exhibits, the museum effectively converted the photographs from commercial promotional material into cultural and historical artifacts. As a result, the museum’s display of the photographs was deemed fair use.
This decision underscores the fair use doctrine's defensive capabilities. Even where copyrighted works are copied exactly, the court’s decision reinforces that the underlying purpose may guide its analysis.
Authors: Ayesha Khanna and Josephine Hu, 2025/2026 Articling Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@diane_soko
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@diane_soko
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CIPO Explores Fast-Tracking Patents for Innovation in Priority Sectors
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly is reportedly evaluating a proposal from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) that would accelerate patent applications in artificial intelligence…