Clint Eastwood has reportedly succeeded in receiving a default judgment against a CBD retailer for using his name and likeness to promote its products.
In the suit, the Hollywood star claimed that Norok Innovation created fake news articles that mentioned Mr. Eastwood both in the content of the article and within the articles' metadata. This allowed Norok to take advantage of search engine algorithms to guide customers to the CBD retailers when those customers searched for Mr. Eastwood’s name, a tactic with which Mr. Eastwood took issue .
As Norok did not defend, Mr. Eastwood successfully moved for default judgment.
While Mr. Eastwood sought US$3 million in damages, he was only awarded US$2.6 million. Mr. Eastwood had only agreed to one endorsement deal prior to this for a Super Bowl commercial in 2012, and so the judge was not able to find that Mr. Eastwood’s market value for an endorsement was at the amount Mr. Eastwood claimed.
Authors: Mark Leonard and Divyajyot (DJ) Verma, 2022/2023 Articling Student-at-law
As reported by Reuters, three former employees of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ("TSMC") were charged with violating security law and other offences in Taiwan. The prosecutors have…
As reported by Reuters, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated an $81 million award against Boeing, in a suit brought by Zunum Aero, an aircraft startup, accusing Boeing of stealing trade…
As reported by Mason Hayes & Curran, the Federal Court of Australia has reportedly found the supermarket chain, Aldi, liable for copyright infringement regarding illustrations used on the…
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York…
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium…
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce…
