
Clint Eastwood has reportedly succeeded in receiving a default judgment against a CBD retailer for using his name and likeness to promote its products.
In the suit, the Hollywood star claimed that Norok Innovation created fake news articles that mentioned Mr. Eastwood both in the content of the article and within the articles' metadata. This allowed Norok to take advantage of search engine algorithms to guide customers to the CBD retailers when those customers searched for Mr. Eastwood’s name, a tactic with which Mr. Eastwood took issue .
As Norok did not defend, Mr. Eastwood successfully moved for default judgment.
While Mr. Eastwood sought US$3 million in damages, he was only awarded US$2.6 million. Mr. Eastwood had only agreed to one endorsement deal prior to this for a Super Bowl commercial in 2012, and so the judge was not able to find that Mr. Eastwood’s market value for an endorsement was at the amount Mr. Eastwood claimed.
Authors: Mark Leonard and Divyajyot (DJ) Verma, 2022/2023 Articling Student-at-law
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carnegie Hall Takes Trademark Center Stage in Legal Battle
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court Reaffirms Importance of Viva Voce Testimony
In McCain Foods Limited v. J.R. Simplot Company 2024 FC 1729, the Federal Court considered the circumstances in which an examination for discovery of a person, other than a person examined under Rule… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Salt‑N‑Pepa Wage Legal Battle to Reclaim Their Recordings
Salt-N-Pepa are reportedly suing their record label, Universal Music Group (“UMG”), to attempt to reclaim rights to their music, including hip-hop staples “Shoop” and “Push It”. As reported by the New…