Copyright Lawsuit against Emily Ratajkowski for Use of Paparazzi Photo Has Settled
As recently reported by BuzzFeed News, Emily Ratajkowski has reached a settlement in the copyright infringement lawsuit brought against her for posting a paparazzi picture of herself on her Instagram story.
Shortly before the settlement was reached, the Court declined to grant a summary judgment motion brought by Ratajkowski on the basis that the image was not protected by copyright and that her use thereof was a fair use. The Court decided the case should proceed to a trial on the merits. In rendering its decision, the Court considered, for the first time, the copyright ramifications of an Instagram story, which lasts only 24 hours, versus an Instagram post, which lasts (potentially) forever.
The court found that the length of availability of the infringing image was a significant factor that should be considered: “If the Instagram photograph only appeared for twenty-four hours, it is much less likely that someone might take the photograph from the Instagram account rather than licensing it from the plaintiff, compared to that same risk if the Instagram photograph was permanently on the Instagram account.”
In light of the settlement, the question of whether publication of an image of oneself is a fair use will not be adjudicated at this time.
Authors: Sarah Stothart and Samara Friszman, 2021/2022 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@zeg
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…