Dairy Queen Given Green Light to Sue for Alleged “Blizzard” Trademark Infringement
Recently, a Minnesota judge ruled that Dairy Queen, owned by Berkshire Hathaway Inc., could proceed with its lawsuit against W.B. Mason Co. for the alleged infringement of its “Blizzard” trademark , used for its popular ice cream product. Dairy Queen seeks to stop W.B. Mason Co., an office supplies distributor, from selling “Blizzard” bottled spring water.
Berkshire Hathaway has owned Minneapolis-based Dairy Queen since 1998. Dairy Queen uses the “Blizzard” title for its famous treat consisting of soft-serve ice cream mixed with candy, chocolate, M&Ms and various other toppings. The company has used this name since 1946 and has five Blizzard trademarks dating back to 1952.
Dairy Queen is concerned about the “Blizzard” bottled spring water sold by W.B. Mason Co. in part because many Dairy Queen stores sell bottled water. This, Dairy Queen asserts in its statement of claim, may cause “irreparable injury” and “customer confusion”. In addition to an injunction, the company is also asking for profits from water sales.
W.B. Mason Co. has filed a counter-claim seeking a declaratory judgment that no trademark infringement or trademark dilution exists in the matter. In its claim, the company argues that it is “not aware of a single person who has ever been confused by its use of ‘BLIZZARD’. Indeed, no reasonable person would ever mistakenly believe that copy paper or spring water sold by W.B. MASON and emblazoned with the W.B MASON mark and logo emanates from, or is associated with, Dairy Queen.”
Author: Alexandra Murray
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Fallout from Trade Secret Theft in Taiwan
As reported by Reuters, three former employees of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ("TSMC") were charged with violating security law and other offences in Taiwan. The prosecutors have… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
U.S Appeals Court Sends $81 Million Award Against Boeing Flying Back In!
As reported by Reuters, the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals has reinstated an $81 million award against Boeing, in a suit brought by Zunum Aero, an aircraft startup, accusing Boeing of stealing trade… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carrot Puff Copycat: Copyright Infringed in Federal Court of Australia Case
As reported by Mason Hayes & Curran, the Federal Court of Australia has reportedly found the supermarket chain, Aldi, liable for copyright infringement regarding illustrations used on the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Carnegie Hall Takes Trademark Center Stage in Legal Battle
Carnegie Hall has reportedly commenced an action against Carnegie Diner and Café for trademark infringement.In its complaint filed with the United States District Court, Southern District of New York… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce…