Dairy Queen Given Green Light to Sue for Alleged “Blizzard” Trademark Infringement
Recently, a Minnesota judge ruled that Dairy Queen, owned by Berkshire Hathaway Inc., could proceed with its lawsuit against W.B. Mason Co. for the alleged infringement of its “Blizzard” trademark , used for its popular ice cream product. Dairy Queen seeks to stop W.B. Mason Co., an office supplies distributor, from selling “Blizzard” bottled spring water.
Berkshire Hathaway has owned Minneapolis-based Dairy Queen since 1998. Dairy Queen uses the “Blizzard” title for its famous treat consisting of soft-serve ice cream mixed with candy, chocolate, M&Ms and various other toppings. The company has used this name since 1946 and has five Blizzard trademarks dating back to 1952.
Dairy Queen is concerned about the “Blizzard” bottled spring water sold by W.B. Mason Co. in part because many Dairy Queen stores sell bottled water. This, Dairy Queen asserts in its statement of claim, may cause “irreparable injury” and “customer confusion”. In addition to an injunction, the company is also asking for profits from water sales.
W.B. Mason Co. has filed a counter-claim seeking a declaratory judgment that no trademark infringement or trademark dilution exists in the matter. In its claim, the company argues that it is “not aware of a single person who has ever been confused by its use of ‘BLIZZARD’. Indeed, no reasonable person would ever mistakenly believe that copy paper or spring water sold by W.B. MASON and emblazoned with the W.B MASON mark and logo emanates from, or is associated with, Dairy Queen.”
Author: Alexandra Murray
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@jeswinthomas
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…