Ford Hits the Brakes on Patent Application for Self-Repossessing Cars
After announcing a patent application in early 2023 for a patent that would revolutionize the way lenders repossess vehicles, as of recently, Ford’s application has reportedly been marked as abandoned.
The patent application described numerous ways lenders could utilize smart car features to their advantage when attempting to repossess vehicles from delinquent borrowers. The features would allow lenders to cause certain annoyances until the borrower contacted the financial agency. These include playing unpleasant sounds through the vehicle’s audio system or disabling the car’s air conditioning.
If the non-payment issue is still not resolved in spite of the annoyances, lenders would be able to place the vehicle in a “lockout condition”, preventing a person from entering a vehicle. Alternatively, the lender could confine where the vehicle could travel, such as only allowing the owner to travel to work or drop a child off at school.
The patent application also described further available remedies for lenders where the vehicle has self-driving capabilities, such as directing the vehicle to drive from the owner’s home to an impound lot, or even a junk yard if the system registers that the market value of the vehicle is below a pre-determined threshold price.
Authors: Arash Rouhi and Josh Sloan
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@opak
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…