
Upon discovering approximately 3,000 pieces of their children’s artwork for sale online without consent, a group of parents in Quebec have threatened legal action against a junior high school art teacher and the Lester B. Pearson School Board for $1.4 million.
The teacher allegedly reproduced the students’ original “creepy portraits” of their classmates on various items such as mugs, canvases, cushions, decorations, and bags and listed them on fineartamerica.com for prices ranging from $30 to $120 USD.
The parents allege their children’s artwork was “used without the consent of their creators, in bad faith, and in violation of all laws related to the intellectual property of an artist.”
The context through which the material emerged – a classroom setting – compounded by the authoritative position of the teacher and high prices of the items to profit off the children’s artwork allegedly exacerbated the egregiousness of the act, according to the parents’ demand letter. As a result, in addition to damages, the parents seek removal of their children’s artwork from the platform, the teacher’s suspension and a letter of apology.
The school board issued a statement in response to the matter.
Author: Ayesha Khanna
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court Reaffirms Importance of Viva Voce Testimony
In McCain Foods Limited v. J.R. Simplot Company 2024 FC 1729, the Federal Court considered the circumstances in which an examination for discovery of a person, other than a person examined under Rule… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Salt‑N‑Pepa Wage Legal Battle to Reclaim Their Recordings
Salt-N-Pepa are reportedly suing their record label, Universal Music Group (“UMG”), to attempt to reclaim rights to their music, including hip-hop staples “Shoop” and “Push It”. As reported by the New… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Europe Rejects "Love" Trademark for Apparel
The European General Court reportedly ruled against a German company, sprd.netrd.net, seeking to trademark an “I love” sign for clothing. The proposed trademark included a red heart symbolizing "love…