Motorcycle Aficionados Have Reason to Rally after “Sturgis” Trademark Ruled Invalid
The Sturgis Motorcycle Rally is an annual, world famous motorcycle rally held in Sturgis, South Dakota since 1938. The trademark over “Sturgis” and several related phrases has been held by Sturgis Motorcycle Rally Inc. (“SMRI”) since 1996, preventing businesses from freely using or producing goods bearing the word, causing great consternation among the rally attendees and those living in Sturgis. However, that looks to have changed after a Federal Court Judge issued an order on December 11, 2019 cancelling the “Sturgis” trademark.
Rushmore Photo & Gifts Inc. (“Rushmore”) had long been using the word “Sturgis” on the souvenirs it sold and continued to use it even after SMRI registered the trademark. In 2011, SMRI began a trademark infringement lawsuit in an attempt to prevent RPG from using the word “Sturgis.” The dispute went to trial in 2015 where the jury found in favour of SMRI, placing an injunction on the use of “Sturgis” marks. However, the jury’s verdict was overturned in favour of Rushmore when the appellate court ruled that SMRI did not have trademark rights to the word.
On December 11, 2019, Federal Judge Jeff Viken confirmed that the “Sturgis” mark was invalid and that a trademark cancellation be sent to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, thereby placing “Sturgis” in the public domain.
Author: Megan Brooks
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@duncan2118
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…