The Verve’s 1997 hit song “Bitter Sweet Symphony” was one of the most popular songs of the Britpop era. Verve frontman Richard Ashcroft never received any profits from the track due to a copyright ruling.
In “Bitter Sweet Symphony”, the Verve sampled an orchestral cover of the Rolling Stones’ song “The Last Time”. The original license granted The Verve permission to use a five-note segment of the orchestral cover in exchange for 50% of the royalties earned. However, after “Bitter Sweet Symphony” was released, the former Stones manager, Allen Klein, sued for 100% of the royalties on the basis that the sample the Verve actually used was longer than was contemplated by the original license. Klein’s suit was successful, and Ashcroft was forced to give 100% of the song’s royalties to Mick Jagger and Keith Richards.
The BBC reports that the Stones have now voluntarily returned the songwriting credits for “Bitter Sweet Symphony” to Ashcroft and all future royalties from the song will now be Ashcroft’s. The news was announced by Ashcroft himself as he accepted a lifetime achievement honour at the Ivor Novello Awards.
In an interview with the BBC, Ashcroft characterized the news as “life-affirming,” adding that he “never had a personal beef with the Stones. They’ve always been the greatest rock & roll band in the world.”
Bitter Sweet Symphony has sold 1,276,209 copies in the United Kingdom alone.
Author: Shadi Varkiani
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@jasonrosewell
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…