A logo of a cabin surrounded by trees was the subject of a recent trademark dispute between clothing retailers Roots Corp. and YM Inc. As reported by Yahoo!, Roots filed their cabin trademark first in 2014 (right). YM registered its trademark in 2017 (left).
Roots applied to strike YM’s registered trademark, arguing that the trademark was confusing, lacked distinctiveness, and the declaration of use contained material misstatements.
The Federal Court of Canada disagreed, concluding that YM’s mark would not be confused for Roots’ mark. Justice Locke, as he then was, explained that using an image of a cabin in its inherent environment is no more distinctive than using the word “cabin”. Indeed, a quick comparison of the above logos reveals that none of the shapes, wording or font is similar.
Unsurprisingly, this is not the first time trademark disputes have occurred over logos that contain the same object but are different on their face. For example in 2018, two sausage companies battled over trademarked logos of a pig that each contained different colour schemes, wording, and company names.
Author: Christina Liao, 2018/2019 Articling Student-at-law
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@eulauretta
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…