Therapy Reinvented: Microsoft’s AI Patent Unveiled
The machine-human divide has long been defined by the ability, or lack thereof, to feel. To be human is to have empathy and compassion – emotions which robots are simply incapable of expressing. Well, perhaps that has changed. Microsoft has now patented an AI-powered therapy app, and, in doing so, may have altered everything we thought we knew about computers.
As reported by Futurism, the AI therapist is designed to provide users with emotional support, analyze their feelings and carefully store user conversations, which can then form a digital “memory” of the patient, their lives and their emotional triggers. The patent claims “a method and apparatus for providing emotional care in a session between a user and conversational agent”. The application is marketed as less of an emergency service, and more of a “general space for a user to be able to talk about life”.
The patent indicates that, as more user information is gathered, the AI can start to read emotional cues, ask appropriate questions and even make suggestions for how the user should manage their concerns.
Microsoft suggests that the technology may be able to perform even deeper psychoanalysis. The user would have the option to take an “explicit psychological test”, to be assessed by a “scoring algorithm predefined by psychologists or experts in psychological domains”.
Given rapid advancements in AI technology, it would be naïve to say that computers will never be able to engage in emotional nuance. That said, as suggested by others, the potential availability of this technology does beg certain questions, including whether we trust machines to penetrate psyches, to play a crucial role in supporting mental and emotional well-being, or to provide a safe and confidential space for individuals to explore their thoughts, feelings and experiences.
Author: Emily Groper, 2023/2024 Articling Student-At-Law
Photo Credit: iStock.com/metamorworks.
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…