Carrot Puff Copycat: Copyright Infringed in Federal Court of Australia Case
As reported by Mason Hayes & Curran, the Federal Court of Australia has reportedly found the supermarket chain, Aldi, liable for copyright infringement regarding illustrations used on the packaging of children’s food products.
The case involved Aldi’s house brand, MAMIA, which it reportedly admitted was designed to look like another brand, BELLIES. In 2019, when Aldi underwent a redesign of the packaging for the MAMIA brand, it reportedly instructed a design company to use BELLIES as a benchmark. As the below photo illustrates, the new MAMIA packaging was similar to BELLIES.

The Australian court concluded that it was likely Aldi had drawn inspiration for the MAMIA designs from the BELLIES packaging. This was inferred from the following similarities: a small, oval-shaped cartoon character with a light-coloured belly, a solid white background, a two-column layout, a rounded, childlike font, and a number in the upper-right corner, among others.
The decision found that these layout and design elements involved a degree of “creativity or originality”, and they “go beyond an idea or concept and constitute a form of expression”. The court was ultimately satisfied that Aldi “ought reasonably to have known that the making of the relevant articles constituted an infringement of the copyright in the Applicant’s Puff Works”.
Authors: Emily Groper and Annie MacKinnon
Photo Credit: istock.com/Jacob Wackerhausen
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…