Carrot Puff Copycat: Copyright Infringed in Federal Court of Australia Case
As reported by Mason Hayes & Curran, the Federal Court of Australia has reportedly found the supermarket chain, Aldi, liable for copyright infringement regarding illustrations used on the packaging of children’s food products.
The case involved Aldi’s house brand, MAMIA, which it reportedly admitted was designed to look like another brand, BELLIES. In 2019, when Aldi underwent a redesign of the packaging for the MAMIA brand, it reportedly instructed a design company to use BELLIES as a benchmark. As the below photo illustrates, the new MAMIA packaging was similar to BELLIES.

The Australian court concluded that it was likely Aldi had drawn inspiration for the MAMIA designs from the BELLIES packaging. This was inferred from the following similarities: a small, oval-shaped cartoon character with a light-coloured belly, a solid white background, a two-column layout, a rounded, childlike font, and a number in the upper-right corner, among others.
The decision found that these layout and design elements involved a degree of “creativity or originality”, and they “go beyond an idea or concept and constitute a form of expression”. The court was ultimately satisfied that Aldi “ought reasonably to have known that the making of the relevant articles constituted an infringement of the copyright in the Applicant’s Puff Works”.
Authors: Emily Groper and Annie MacKinnon
Photo Credit: istock.com/Jacob Wackerhausen
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
CIPO Explores Fast-Tracking Patents for Innovation in Priority Sectors
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly is reportedly evaluating a proposal from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) that would accelerate patent applications in artificial intelligence… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Rock History and Copyright: The Show Goes On
Veteran rock photographer, Neil Zlozower, reportedly sued the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame for allegedly using his copyrighted images of Eddie Van Halen in its museum exhibits without his permission… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Patent Reinstatement Throws “Glory” Cherries in the Pits
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington (“District Court”) reportedly reinstated the Canadian government’s patent for the “Staccato” cherry, developed by Agriculture and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Sportswear Brand Sues University Over Similarities in Merchandise
As reported by the Associated Press, Columbia Sportswear has sued Columbia University, claiming that the university infringed the sportswear company’s trademark and breached an agreement between the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Call Dropped: Verizon Cuts Deal in $175M Patent Clash
Verizon and Headwater Research LLC have reportedly agreed to settle a patent infringement lawsuit that ended with a $175 million USD jury verdict against the telecom giant. Headwater, a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Nintendo Secures Copyright Victory in China
In a recent copyright infringement case, the Jiangsu High Court ruled in favor of Nintendo, awarding the company approximately $28,000 USD, or 200,000 RMB, and an injunction against an unnamed…