Carrot Puff Copycat: Copyright Infringed in Federal Court of Australia Case
As reported by Mason Hayes & Curran, the Federal Court of Australia has reportedly found the supermarket chain, Aldi, liable for copyright infringement regarding illustrations used on the packaging of children’s food products.
The case involved Aldi’s house brand, MAMIA, which it reportedly admitted was designed to look like another brand, BELLIES. In 2019, when Aldi underwent a redesign of the packaging for the MAMIA brand, it reportedly instructed a design company to use BELLIES as a benchmark. As the below photo illustrates, the new MAMIA packaging was similar to BELLIES.

The Australian court concluded that it was likely Aldi had drawn inspiration for the MAMIA designs from the BELLIES packaging. This was inferred from the following similarities: a small, oval-shaped cartoon character with a light-coloured belly, a solid white background, a two-column layout, a rounded, childlike font, and a number in the upper-right corner, among others.
The decision found that these layout and design elements involved a degree of “creativity or originality”, and they “go beyond an idea or concept and constitute a form of expression”. The court was ultimately satisfied that Aldi “ought reasonably to have known that the making of the relevant articles constituted an infringement of the copyright in the Applicant’s Puff Works”.
Authors: Emily Groper and Annie MacKinnon
Photo Credit: istock.com/Jacob Wackerhausen
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Sportswear Brand Sues University Over Similarities in Merchandise
As reported by the Associated Press, Columbia Sportswear has sued Columbia University, claiming that the university infringed the sportswear company’s trademark and breached an agreement between the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Call Dropped: Verizon Cuts Deal in $175M Patent Clash
Verizon and Headwater Research LLC have reportedly agreed to settle a patent infringement lawsuit that ended with a $175 million USD jury verdict against the telecom giant. Headwater, a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Nintendo Secures Copyright Victory in China
In a recent copyright infringement case, the Jiangsu High Court ruled in favor of Nintendo, awarding the company approximately $28,000 USD, or 200,000 RMB, and an injunction against an unnamed… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Regulatory Updates – Impacts of Global Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals
Recent tariff measures affecting pharmaceutical products and ingredients have introduced new compliance and cost considerations for manufacturers, distributors, and importers operating in Canada and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
US Appeals Court: Supertramp Songwriter Must "Give a Little Bit"
As reported by Reuters, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Roger Hodgson, the former Supertramp singer and songwriter, must compensate three former band members for a share of… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Fallout from Trade Secret Theft in Taiwan
As reported by Reuters, three former employees of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ("TSMC") were charged with violating security law and other offences in Taiwan. The prosecutors have…