Rubik’s Brand Ltd., the creator of the Rubik’s Cube, has lost its 3D EU trademark after the EU General Court of Appeal declared it invalid. Rubik’s Brand Ltd. has been fighting since 2006 to gain a trademark over the iconic toy’s shape. However, EU trademark law prevents a company from getting a monopoly on technical solutions or functional characteristics of a product.
While Rubik’s Brand Ltd. originally had some success in defending the trademark, the company has suffered a series of losses since 2016. In 2016, the EU’s top court ruled that Rubik’s Brand Ltd. could not use the trademark to create a monopoly over the functional characteristics of the product, and in 2017 the EU’s Intellectual Property Office removed protection for the cube’s shape. Rubik’s Brand challenged this decision at the EU General Court. The EU General Court found that the essential characteristics of the shape are necessary to obtain the technical result of the rotating capability.
As a result, the Intellectual Property Office was correct in removing the trademark.
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be…
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers…
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a…
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its…
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In…
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…
