US Copyright Office Refuses to Protect the European Championship Trophy
The US Copyright Office has refused to grant protection to the Union of European Football Association’s (“UEFA”) Henri Delaunay Trophy (the “Trophy”). The Trophy is a silver two-handled vase, with a tiered pedestal foot, bulb-shaped body, long neck and a three-tiered lip. The Trophy is awarded to the winner of the European Championship.

In 2016, UEFA filed an application with the US Copyright Office to register a three-dimensional visual art claim for the Trophy. The US Copyright Office refused the application, stating it “lacks the authorship necessary to support a copyright claim.”
UEFA asked the US Copyright Office to reconsider their decision. However, the US Copyright Office denied the application stating that the trophy did not exhibit the creativity required to support a registration. Specifically, the Copyright Office stated that the Trophy “as a whole consists of a standard trophy vase accented with a few bands and twisted handles” and that “[t]he very simple combination of elements into an expected configuration given the underlying nature of the work does not exhibit the creativity to support a registration.”
The Review Board of the United States Copyright Office (the “Board”) then considered a second request for reconsideration on behalf of UEFA. UEFA disputed the Copyright Office’s claim that the Trophy was a standard vase, arguing that the body, wide tray opening and the twisted handles were indicative of its creativity. After review, the Board affirmed the prior decision to deny registration as the Trophy does not contain the “requisite authorship necessary to sustain a claim to copyright.” Despite UEFA claiming that the Trophy is not a standard trophy vase, the Board disagreed and noted that “[r]egardless of the specific history of trophy vases, the overall shape of the work shares common design features with amphora, a standard shape in Greek and Etruscan pottery.”
As the decision by the Board was in response to a second request for reconsideration, the decision constitutes final agency action in the matter.
Author: Steve Inglis
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@jblesly
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CIPO Explores Fast-Tracking Patents for Innovation in Priority Sectors
Industry Minister Mélanie Joly is reportedly evaluating a proposal from the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (“CIPO”) that would accelerate patent applications in artificial intelligence… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Rock History and Copyright: The Show Goes On
Veteran rock photographer, Neil Zlozower, reportedly sued the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame for allegedly using his copyrighted images of Eddie Van Halen in its museum exhibits without his permission… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Patent Reinstatement Throws “Glory” Cherries in the Pits
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington (“District Court”) reportedly reinstated the Canadian government’s patent for the “Staccato” cherry, developed by Agriculture and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Sportswear Brand Sues University Over Similarities in Merchandise
As reported by the Associated Press, Columbia Sportswear has sued Columbia University, claiming that the university infringed the sportswear company’s trademark and breached an agreement between the…