CSA Provides Updated Guidance on Virtual Shareholder Meetings
Virtual shareholder meetings have become ubiquitous for public companies since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. These meetings are typically conducted entirely virtually, in place of an in-person meeting, or through a “hybrid” format held in-person while also allowing participation through electronic means.
Against this background, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) recently published guidance on virtual shareholder meetings. The guidance follows informal consultations with market participants and stakeholders regarding their recent experience with virtual shareholder meetings, and is intended to help issuers comply with securities law and adopt practices that facilitate shareholder engagement.
Disclosure Regarding Shareholder Access and Participation
Issuers should provide clear and comprehensive disclosure in their proxy materials concerning the logistics required to access, participate in and vote at a virtual shareholder meeting. Meeting materials should provide complete explanations of the registration, authentication and voting processes for both registered and beneficial shareholders.
To facilitate shareholder engagement, issuers should expressly outline how shareholder questions will be received and answered and how shareholder participation will otherwise be accommodated and arranged during the meeting.
Issuers should also provide contact information where shareholders can obtain technical support if difficulties arise during the registration process or while accessing or participating in the meeting.
Shareholder Participation
The CSA encourages issuers to provide a level of shareholder engagement at virtual meetings similar to the level of engagement shareholders could reasonably expect when attending an in-person meeting. This would include opportunities for shareholders to make motions or raise points of order and pose questions or provide direct feedback to management during any question and answer segments of the meeting. Proponents of shareholder proposals to be voted on at the meeting should be given the opportunity to speak to the proposals.
The CSA recognizes that meeting chairs must exercise some level of discretion when fielding questions and managing the meeting. However, it recommends that any such practices applied at virtual meetings be consistent with established practices for in-person meetings.
If a shareholder meeting is contested, it is recommended that issuers consult their legal advisors on the suitability of holding a virtual meeting. Issuers should also consider negotiating a meeting protocol agreement with the dissident in advance of a contested meeting.
It is expected that virtual shareholder meetings will continue in some capacity even after the COVID-19 pandemic has ended. Issuers should ensure that virtual shareholder meetings are held in accordance with the applicable corporate statutes, constating documents and securities law.
For further information, please contact any member of our Capital Markets Group.
Expertise
Authors
Insights
-
REITS and Income Securities
The Legal Industry Reviews Edition 5 - REITs Chapter
Stephen Pincus, Brenda Gosselin, and Bill Gorman have co-authored The Canadian REIT Structure in the fifth edition of The Legal Industry Reviews Canada.To view the… -
Financial Services Regulatory
Canadian Securities Administrators Extend Compliance Deadline in Interim Approach to Value-Referenced Crypto Assets
On April 17, 2024, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) provided an update to their interim approach in respect of “Value-Referenced Crypto Assets” (VRCAs), as set out in the CSA’s guidance in… -
Financial Services Regulatory
Obligations and Opportunity - Budget 2024’s Impact on the Blockchain Industry
As crypto-assets become subject to further regulation both domestically and globally, industry players find themselves presented not only with new obligations but also with new opportunities. Canada’s… -
Capital Markets
Public Safety Canada Releases Updated Guidance on Modern Slavery Reporting Obligations
The Fighting Against Forced Labour and Child Labour in Supply Chains Act (the “Act”) came into force on January 1, 2024, implementing enhanced reporting requirements for certain entities to… -
Capital Markets
Ontario Court of Appeal Enforces Contractual Waiver of Statutory Dissent Rights
Ontario’s Court of Appeal concluded in a recent decision that, subject to limited exceptions, shareholders can contractually waive statutory “dissent rights”, which allow shareholders to dissent in… -
Capital Markets
CSA Provides Further Updated Guidance on Virtual Shareholder Meetings
On February 22, 2024, the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) recently published updated guidance on virtual shareholder meetings following initial guidance provided in February 2022. See…
Featured Work
-
Capital Markets
Saba Capital reaches agreement with Citadel Income Fund
Goodmans LLP acted for Saba Capital Management, L.P. in relation to its agreement with Citadel Income Fund and its manager, Artemis Investment Management Limited following a protracted dispute… -
Capital Markets
RioCan REIT completes private placement offering of $300 million Series AK debentures
Goodmans LLP advised RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust in connection with a brokered private placement offering of $300 million principal amount of Series AK senior unsecured debentures… -
Mining
Hudbay Minerals completes US$402 million bought deal equity offering
Goodmans LLP advised Hudbay Minerals Inc. in the public offering of its common shares for aggregate gross proceeds of US$402,477,000, including the full exercise of the underwriters’ overallotment… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Screaming Eagle merges with Lionsgate Studios
Goodmans LLP acted for Screaming Eagle Acquisition Corp. in connection with its merger with the Studio Business of Lionsgate Entertainment Corp., comprised of its Television Studio and Motion Picture… -
Capital Markets
Dye & Durham’s defence of requisition from Engine Capital
Goodmans LLP is acting for the board of Dye & Durham in connection with a defence of requisition from Engine Capital… -
Capital Markets
Board of WonderFi Technologies Inc.’s proxy defense from KAOS Capital and Mogo
Goodmans LLP acted for the special committee of the board of WonderFi Technologies Inc in connection with its defense of a proxy contest launched by KAOS Capital and MOGO. KAOS Capital is a…
News & Events
-
Banking and Financial Services
Goodmans Lawyers Recognized in the Lexpert Special Edition: Finance and M&A 2024
We are delighted to announce the Lexpert Special Edition: Finance and M&A 2024 once again features Goodmans lawyers among Canada's experts.Congratulations to our 33 featured lawyers:Alan… -
Banking and Financial Services
The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory 2024 Continues to Recognize Goodmans
We are proud to announce Goodmans LLP has once again been recognized in the 2024 edition of The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory.91 Goodmans lawyers have been recognized as top-tier in their… -
Banking and Financial Services
Chambers and Partners Continues to Honour Goodmans with Global Recognition
We are proud to announce Goodmans LLP has once again received top-tier recognition from Chambers and Partners in the Chambers Global 2024 Guide released today. Recognition from…