More Homes For Everyone Act, 2022: A First Step to Address Housing Affordability?
On March 30, 2022, the Ontario government introduced the More Homes For Everyone Act, 2022, also known as Bill 109, intended to implement certain recommendations from the Ontario Housing Affordability Task Force (the “Task Force”).
Bill 109 is the first in what the provincial government indicated may be a series of proposed legislative changes to address housing supply and affordability in light of the Task Force’s recommendations. For example, the province is currently seeking public comments on the Environmental Registry of Ontario for a proposal to permit multi-unit housing as-of-right on sites zoned for single-unit detached homes. The comment period ends on April 29, 2022. The province also stated it intends to prepare a supply action plan every year over four years, starting in 2022-23, with additional policies and tools to support “missing middle” housing.
In the meantime, Bill 109 proposes certain changes to the Planning Act which appear intended to facilitate faster processing of development applications, among other things. The key legislative changes proposed in Bill 109 are outlined below.
Site Plan Approval
- Mandatory Delegation of Site Plan Approval. Currently, municipal councils may delegate site plan approval to staff, but are not required to do so. Bill 109 would remove the ability for municipal councils to decide on site plan applications; instead, staff would have the sole authority to review and approve site plans submitted on or after Bill 109 comes into force. In the City of Toronto, as an example, this would eliminate the ability of local councillors to “bump up” site plan applications to City Council for approval.
- Complete Applications. Bill 109 would establish a process for declaring site plan applications complete, similar to that which currently applies to other planning applications. Municipalities may require applicants to consult with staff to determine the required information and materials for a complete site plan application. Municipalities would be required to declare whether a site plan application is complete within 30 days of submission. The Ontario Land Tribunal (the “Tribunal”) would have the jurisdiction to decide whether a complete application has been submitted.
Bill 109 would also extend the time period for review of a complete site plan application from 30 days to 60 days before an applicant can appeal the site plan application to the Tribunal.
Application Processing Times
Bill 109 would legislate time frames for municipalities to make a decision on complete rezoning and site plan applications, after which a municipality would be required to refund some or all of the application fee. As illustrated by the following table, starting on January 1, 2023, the proposed amount required to be refunded increases over time.
Instrument | Refund 50% of Application Fee | Refund 75% of Application Fee | Refund 100% of Application Fee |
Zoning By-law Amendment | 90 days | 150 days | 210 days |
Zoning By-law and concurrent Official Plan Amendment | 120 days | 180 days | 240 days |
Site Plan Approval | 60 days | 90 days | Not Applicable |
While the goal may be to encourage more timely review of applications, the requirement for a decision within a limited period of time may result in municipalities refusing applications to avoid providing refunds. Municipalities may also implement more extensive pre-application consultation requirements.
Ontario Housing Accelerator
Bill 109 would formalize the process for municipalities to request that the province accelerate approval of priority community and housing projects. Currently, municipalities may request the Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing (the “Minister”) issue a Minister’s Zoning Order to streamline the approval process, but little guidance has been provided on the requirements for such a request.
Bill 109 would allow a municipal council to pass a resolution for the Minister to exercise the municipality’s zoning powers and accelerate the approval of any other permit, licence, or approval, such as a Conservation Authority permission to develop.
To enact the resolution, the municipality must give notice and consult with the public, identify the lands to which the order would apply, and how the Minister would exercise its authority, including setting out details for the proposed development. The zoning order would not have to be consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement or conform to any official plan or provincial plan, although the power cannot be exercised on lands in the Greenbelt.
Parkland Dedication
Bill 109 would limit the alternative rate for parkland for lands designated as “transit-oriented community lands” under the Transit-Oriented Communities Act, 2020 as follows:
- development sites that do not exceed five hectares will be subject to a rate of 10%, and
- development sites that are greater than five hectares will be subject to a rate of 15%.
Although no transit-oriented community lands are currently designated under the Act, several locations in Toronto and York Region proposed for development near higher-order transit are candidates for this designation.
Ministerial Approval of Official Plans/Official Plan Amendments
There is no appeal to the Tribunal from a decision by the Minister regarding an official plan or official plan amendment, such as one resulting from the municipal comprehensive reviews currently being undertaken by upper-tier and single-tier municipalities to ensure conformity with provincial policy.
Bill 109 would grant two significant powers to the Minister where the Minister is the approval authority for official plans and official plan amendments:
- The Minister would be able to refer an official plan or official plan amendment to the Tribunal to hold a hearing and make either a recommendation back to a Minister or a binding decision. Any person who made submissions to the municipal council would be able to seek party status at that hearing.
- The Minister would be able to suspend the time period for making a decision on official plans and official plan amendments. Currently, the Minister has 120 days to make a decision or else risk an appeal by the municipality for the Minister’s failure to make a decision. The proposed legislation would have the effect of permitting the Minister to extend that time period indefinitely. Bill 109 would also apply retroactively to suspend the time period for any official plan or official plan amendment forwarded to the Minister on or before March 29, 2022.
Next Steps
Bill 109 was introduced in the Ontario Legislature for first reading. There may be further changes to the legislation before its final enactment. The release of additional regulatory proposals, such as the proposal to permit “missing middle” housing as-of-right, may also have implications for these legislative changes. We will continue to monitor Bill 109 as it proceeds through the legislative process.
For further information, please contact any member of our Municipal and Land Development Group.
Expertise
Authors
Insights
-
Municipal and Land Development
We Know What You Did Last Summer: Land Use Planning Edition
The late spring and summer of 2024 brought yet more changes to Ontario’s land use planning framework as the province continued to refine the regulatory context for development. Among other changes… -
Municipal and Land Development
Shifting Sands – Ontario Proposes More Changes to the Land Use Planning Framework through Bill 185
On April 10, 2024, the Province of Ontario introduced the Cutting Red Tape to Build More Homes Act, 2024, which proposes a number of amendments to the Planning Act and related legislation that would… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Director Duties and Climate Change
Decisions earlier this year from the English courts in ClientEarth v Shell Plc et al., and the recent appeal decision from the Court of Appeal of England and Wales, shed light on climate change issues… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Downstream GHG Emissions and Sierra Club Canada Foundation v Canada (Environment and Climate Change)
The Federal Court’s recent decision in Sierra Club Canada Foundation v. Canada (Environment and Climate Change) highlights the continuing focus in Canada on climate change litigation. The case… -
Environmental
Ontario Amends the Mining Act to Streamline Closure Planning and Mineral Recovery Requirements
On May 18, 2023, the Province of Ontario granted Royal Assent to various amendments to the Mining Act through Bill 71, the Building More Mines Act, 2023 (“Bill 71”). The government’s stated purpose of… -
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
Limits of Climate Change Suits Against the Government: Mathur v. Ontario Decision
The Superior Court of Justice has now released its decision in Mathur v. Ontario, a case we wrote about earlier this year and which is now a further example of an unsuccessful claim against a…
Featured Work
-
Municipal and Land Development
First Capital REIT to redevelop properties in Yonge-Eglinton area
Goodmans LLP acted for First Capital REIT in connection with the approval of the official plan amendment and rezoning application to permit the future redevelopment of 13 neighbourhoods-designated… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Group led by Michael Andlauer buys Ottawa Senators
Goodmans LLP acted for an entity controlled by Michael Andlauer in its purchase of the Ottawa Senators Hockey Club from the Melnyk Estate… -
Real Estate
Waterfront Toronto partners with Quayside Impact Limited Partnership
Goodmans LLP advised Quayside Impact Limited Partnership (“QILP”), a partnership between Dream Unlimited and Great Gulf, in connection with Waterfront Toronto’s international search for a development… -
Real Estate
Knightstone Group of Companies’ student residence development matters
Goodmans LLP acts for the Knightstone Group of Companies as developer and tenant in the long-term ground leasing of real property from colleges and universities and the subsequent rezoning and… -
Municipal and Land Development
Madison Properties Inc. Redevelopments at Yonge and Eglinton
Goodmans LLP is acting for Madison Properties Inc. in connection with various high-profile redevelopments near the intersection of Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue in the City of Toronto… -
Municipal and Land Development
Oxford Properties Group Redevelopment at Scarborough City Centre
Goodmans LLP is acting for Oxford Properties Group in connection with the official plan and zoning by-law amendment applications for a mixed-use redevelopment west of Scarborough City Centre…
News & Events
-
Mergers and Acquisitions
Chambers and Partners Once Again Honours Goodmans with Top-Tier Recognition
We are delighted to announce Goodmans LLP continues to receive top-tier recognition from Chambers and Partners in the Chambers Canada 2025 Guide.Recognition from Chambers and Partners is based on… -
Banking and Financial Services
The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory 2024 Continues to Recognize Goodmans
We are proud to announce Goodmans LLP has once again been recognized in the 2024 edition of The Canadian Legal Lexpert Directory.91 Goodmans lawyers have been recognized as top-tier in their… -
Banking and Financial Services
Who's Who Legal Continues to Recognize Goodmans in the Canada 2023 Guide
We are pleased to share Goodmans lawyers have been recognized across Who's Who Legal's National Guide: Canada 2023. WWL National Guides identify national or regional leaders in a sector, industry…