AI, AI, Captain! Federal Court Mandates Disclosure of AI-Usage in Court Filings
In effort to promote productivity and equity, the Federal Court (the “Court”) is investigating how best to employ artificial intelligence (“AI”) in the justice system. Specifically, in its Interim Principles and Guidelines, the Court has announced a pilot project to use AI as a translator for court decisions, which would subsequently be reviewed by a human translator for accuracy.
In light of technological advancements and increasing popularity of platforms such as ChatGPT, the Court released a notice to the parties and the profession on AI usage in court proceedings. The evolving policy mandates disclosure of any AI usage in the creation and generation of documents submitted to the Court for the purpose of litigation through a signed declaration. The mandate may be satisfied by simply including a statement such as “AI was used to generate content in this document” at the outset of the document’s text.
Although Chief Justice Paul Crampton of the Federal Court cautioned against the use of AI to decide cases and render judgments presently, he left open such possibilities for the future, pending consultation with the public.
Author: Ayesha Khanna
Photo Credit: istock.com/Thapana Onphalai.
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…