Apple introduced its 2019 iPhone lineup on September 10th, and revealed that the new iPhone 11 and iPhone 11 Pro models will feature an upgraded 12-megapixel front-facing camera. This will allow iPhone users to capture slow motion videos from both the front and rear-facing cameras. Apple used the term “slofie” to describe this new slow-motion selfie feature (combining the words “slo-mo” and “selfie” to create the slofie).
Three days after its announcement on September 10, Apple filed a US trademark application for “Slofie” in connection with “downloadable computer software for use in capturing and recording video.” Apple’s trademark application seeks to protect the term from being used by other device and application companies in marketing any slow-motion selfie features that have been, or may soon be, developed using the word “slofie.”
The term was not widely used prior to Apple’s announcement. It remains to be seen whether the new slofie feature will be popular with iPhone 11 and iPhone 11 Pro users.
Author: Megan Brooks
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@johanmouchet
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…