
Heineken’s Lagunitas Brewery has reportedly advanced its trademark and copyright claims over its "La Tropical" beer in a legal battle involving Cuban-origin brands.
As reported by Bloomberg, the case is part of a larger trend of disputes surrounding brands confiscated during the Cuban revolution. Specifically, it focuses on Heineken’s rights to La Tropical, a beer originally created in Cuba in the 1880s by a family that re-established the brand in Miami in 1998.
This case centres around palm trees in beer branding. In 2017, Heineken acquired the intellectual property rights to "La Tropical". A year later, Soltura launched its beer, Cerveza Palma, inspired by Cuba’s top-selling beer, Cerveza Cristal. Soltura’s beer featured an oval palm tree with a diagonal red stripe across it, which it registered as a U.S. trademark. In 2023, La Tropical introduced Cerveza Tropi Cristal with beer cans designed with a red diagonal stripe and an oval palm tree logo on the back.
Soltura first sued La Tropical in California, but the case was dismissed due to lack of jurisdiction. More recently, the case was brought before the Florida federal court. Judge Darrin P. Gayles ruled largely in favour of La Tropical on Soltura’s motion to dismiss the case. He rejected Soltura’s efforts to dismiss La Tropical’s claims for non-infringement since Soltura had already sued over the trademark. He also found enough commonalities in the palm tree logos to allow the copyright claim to move forward.
However, not all of La Tropical’s claims succeeded. Judge Gayles dismissed its false advertising and unfair trade practices claims, as La Tropical failed to prove harm to its reputation from Soltura’s branding.
Authors: Ayesha Khanna and Carina Leung, 2024/2025 Articling Student-At-Law
Photo Credits: https://unsplash.com/@fotovanfoto
Photo Credits: https://unsplash.com/@fotovanfoto
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court of Appeal Reiterates Permissive Approach to Granting Leave to Amend Defective Pleadings
In Bell Canada et al. v. Millennium Funding, Inc. et al., 2025 FCA 153, Bell Canada and Bell Aliant (collectively, “Bell”) appealed an order granting the Respondents’ (collectively, “Millenium… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Under the Radar, Over the Counter: Goyard's Quiet Battle Against Fake Luxury
Goyard, the Parisian brand established in 1853 and still privately owned, has reportedly faced a surge in counterfeit bags flooding the market. The company refrains from advertising, avoids e-commerce… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Music to Sheeran’s Ears: Supreme Court Declines to Rehear Marvin Gaye Copyright Suit
The US Supreme Court has declined to revisit a copyright dispute over alleged similarities between Ed Sheeran’s 2014 hit, “Thinking Out Loud”, and Marvin Gaye’s 1973 classic, “Let’s Get It On… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Federal Court Reaffirms Importance of Viva Voce Testimony
In McCain Foods Limited v. J.R. Simplot Company 2024 FC 1729, the Federal Court considered the circumstances in which an examination for discovery of a person, other than a person examined under Rule… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Salt‑N‑Pepa Wage Legal Battle to Reclaim Their Recordings
Salt-N-Pepa are reportedly suing their record label, Universal Music Group (“UMG”), to attempt to reclaim rights to their music, including hip-hop staples “Shoop” and “Push It”. As reported by the New… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Europe Rejects "Love" Trademark for Apparel
The European General Court reportedly ruled against a German company, sprd.netrd.net, seeking to trademark an “I love” sign for clothing. The proposed trademark included a red heart symbolizing "love…