Marvel and DC have reportedly lost their long-held trademarks for “Super Hero”.
For decades, the two comic giants jointly owned the trademark, with DC using it for its DC Super Hero Cafe and Marvel using it for the Marvel Super Hero Adventures TV Show. However, after a legal challenge from a London-based comic book artist, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) officially cancelled the trademark.
It all started when Scott Richold, who writes a series of comics featuring superhero babies, applied for US trademarks for the “Super Babies” name. As reported by Reuters, DC reportedly threatened legal action against his company, Superbabies Ltd., for infringing the “Super Hero” marks. In response, Superbabies Ltd. filed a petition to cancel the trademarks.
After Marvel and DC failed to respond to the challenge, the USPTO ruled in favour of Superbabies and cancelled four trademarks owned by the two comic companies. This decision effectively puts the term “Super Hero” into the public domain.
While Marvel and DC still retain other trademarks, such as “SUPER HEROES” and “SUPER-VILLAIN”, as confirmed by The Verge, the term “Super Hero” is now free for anyone to use.
Adam Adler, Superbabies’ counsel, reportedly called this “a victory for creativity and innovation”.
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Browsing for Trouble? Intuit Defends Synchronized Browser Patent Infringement Claim
Intuit Inc. (“Intuit”), the owner of accounting software, TurboTax, has reportedly successfully defended against a claim alleging that TurboTax’s co-browsing feature infringes a patent owned by… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
CanLII and Caseway Reportedly Settle AI Copyright Dispute
As recently reported by Canadian Lawyer Magazine, CanLII has settled its copyright infringement action against AI-powered legal assistant, Caseway AI. The terms of the settlement are confidential, but… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Cut, Sew, but Don’t Sell: South Korea’s Supreme Court Clarifies Trademark Limits
As recently reported by Korea JoongAng Daily, South Korea’s Supreme Court (second division) has issued its first decision regarding whether “upcycling” or customizing branded luxury goods can amount… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a…