Recent tariff measures affecting pharmaceutical products and ingredients have introduced new compliance and cost considerations for manufacturers, distributors, and importers operating in Canada and abroad.
Overview of Recent Developments
At the beginning of April, the Trump administration (the “Administration”) introduced a two-fold tariff strategy affecting pharmaceuticals. Reciprocal tariffs were implemented under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, imposing global reciprocal tariffs on nearly all imports into the U.S. Certain classes of products are exempt, including those covered by statutory exclusions, those identified in Annex II of Executive Order 14257, and select goods – such as pharmaceutical products – subject to pending investigations under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act.
Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act introduces sector-specific tariffs, with official rates to be determined following the United States Department of Commerce’s investigation into the impact of imports on U.S. national security. In a related development, the Administration introduced a 100% tariff on branded drugs from any company not currently operating or actively building operations in the U.S. as of October 1, 2025. At the time of writing, this tariff is on hold pending ongoing discussions with pharmaceutical manufacturers.
In addition to broad-scale tariffs, the Administration has introduced several measures affecting pharmaceutical pricing and trade. In May, an executive order was issued to align U.S. drug prices with the lowest prices offered in other developed nations, leading to agreements with major pharmaceutical companies to implement Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) pricing for certain drugs.
In September, the Administration introduced a framework intended to implement existing and future trade deals. The “Potential Tariff Adjustments for Aligned Partners” Annex was introduced, enumerating a list of products, including generic pharmaceuticals and their ingredients, for which President Trump may be willing to apply only the MFN pricing upon the conclusion of any future reciprocal trade and security deal.
Risks to Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Tariffs introduce a range of compliance and regulatory considerations, including trade requirements such as country-of-origin rules and harmonized tariff schedule classifications (HTS), pricing regulations, and adherence to good manufacturing practices. Changes in supply chains, corporate structure, or any transactions and sales undertaken by a company to comply with tariffs, can create additional compliance obligations.
Emerging Practices
Amid a rapidly shifting and uncertain tariff landscape, companies have adopted a range of practices to remain compliant. Large pharmaceutical companies are investing billions of dollars to reshore or onshore manufacturing to the U.S., reducing exposure to tariff-related risks.
Supply chain diversification is another common strategy. Manufacturers are strategically adjusting their supply chains to mitigate the impact of tariffs and maintain agility in a changing regulatory environment. This includes incorporating tariff scenarios into procurement decisions and rerouting supply chains as needed.
Companies are also implementing “no regret” actions – measures that have minimal operational impact while tariffs remain in flux.
These actions include:
- adjusting product pricing to pass additional costs to consumers;
- applying first-sale-for-export rules;
- reviewing contracts for force majeure clauses or other provisions affected by tariffs; and
- developing internal compliance mechanisms to ensure accurate HTS classifications and country-of-origin determinations.
For further information on the impacts of global tariffs on the pharmaceutical industry, please contact any member of our Intellectual Property Litigation Group.
The author would like to thank Chloe Bechard, Articling Student-At-Law, for her assistance in writing this Update.
Authors
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Sportswear Brand Sues University Over Similarities in Merchandise
As reported by the Associated Press, Columbia Sportswear has sued Columbia University, claiming that the university infringed the sportswear company’s trademark and breached an agreement between the… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Call Dropped: Verizon Cuts Deal in $175M Patent Clash
Verizon and Headwater Research LLC have reportedly agreed to settle a patent infringement lawsuit that ended with a $175 million USD jury verdict against the telecom giant. Headwater, a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Nintendo Secures Copyright Victory in China
In a recent copyright infringement case, the Jiangsu High Court ruled in favor of Nintendo, awarding the company approximately $28,000 USD, or 200,000 RMB, and an injunction against an unnamed… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Regulatory Updates – Impacts of Global Tariffs on Pharmaceuticals
Recent tariff measures affecting pharmaceutical products and ingredients have introduced new compliance and cost considerations for manufacturers, distributors, and importers operating in Canada and… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
US Appeals Court: Supertramp Songwriter Must "Give a Little Bit"
As reported by Reuters, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that Roger Hodgson, the former Supertramp singer and songwriter, must compensate three former band members for a share of… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Fallout from Trade Secret Theft in Taiwan
As reported by Reuters, three former employees of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company ("TSMC") were charged with violating security law and other offences in Taiwan. The prosecutors have…
Featured Work
-
Mergers and Acquisitions
Maple acquires Beyond ADHD
Goodmans LLP acted for Maple Corporation in connection with its acquisition of Beyond ADHD, whereby Beyond ADHD will operate as a Maple subsidiary… -
Mining
Coeur Mining, Inc. to acquire New Gold Inc. for US$7 billion
Goodmans LLP is acting for Coeur Mining, Inc. in connection with its definitive agreement to acquire New Gold Inc. for US$7 billion pursuant to a court-approved plan of arrangement… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
RF Capital Group acquired by iA Financial Corporation in C$597 million all-cash transaction
Goodmans LLP advised RF Capital Group in connection with its acquisition by iA Financial Corporation, a Quebec City-based insurance and wealth management company, in an all-cash transaction valued at… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Dayforce to be taken private by Thoma Bravo for US$12.3 billion
Goodmans LLP is advising Dayforce, Inc. as Canadian counsel in connection with its definitive agreement to be taken private by Thoma Bravo in an all-cash transaction with an enterprise value of… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Apotex acquires CanPrev
Goodmans LLP acted for Apotex Inc. in connection with its acquisition of CanPrev, a leading Canadian provider of vitamins, supplements, and other natural health products… -
Mergers and Acquisitions
Apotex acquires Searchlight Pharma Inc.
Goodmans LLP advised Apotex Inc. in connection with its acquisition of Searchlight Pharma Inc…
News & Events
-
Banking and Financial Services
Goodmans Recognized in the Best Law Firms - Canada 2026
Goodmans is pleased to share we are once again featured in the Best Law Firms - Canada 2026, recognizing us as one of Canada’s most exceptional law firms across 42 industries and practices.We are also… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Goodmans Intellectual Property Litigation Team Distinguished in IAM Global Leaders 2026
We are delighted to share 3 of our Intellectual Property Litigation lawyers have been featured in the IAM Global Leaders 2026. This marks the second consecutive year that all 3 have earned this… -
Banking and Financial Services
Goodmans Named One of Canada’s Best Law Firms for 2026
We are proud to announce Goodmans has once again been featured on The Globe and Mail’s Canada’s Best Law Firms list, recognizing us as one of the country’s best law firms for 2026.Goodmans was listed…