Battle of the Crocodiles – Lacoste is Victorious
A recent decision from a court in India resolved a decades-long dispute between two fashion giants, Lacoste and Crocodile International (“Crocodile”), issuing a permanent injunction against Crocodile. The court found that Crocodile’s use a of similar-looking crocodile logo infringed Lacoste’s trademark.
The dispute first started in 2001, when Lacoste initiated a lawsuit in India to protect the intellectual property of its crocodile logo, which had been registered in India in 1983. Lacoste argued that the companies' crocodile logos were too similar and, as such, were likely to cause confusion among customers. Conversely, Crocodile argued that the differences between the logos were such that any risk of consumer confusion was eliminated.
The court determined that the logos were similar enough to constitute trademark infringement, as they could cause confusion and mislead customers.
Consequently, the court issued a permanent injunction prohibiting Crocodile from producing, marketing, selling, or using any products with the trademark. Additionally, Crocodile was ordered to account for the profits earned from selling goods featuring the crocodile mark.
Author: Maddy Cummings
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@glencarrie
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…