Canadian Government Tightens Funding for Certain Research Grants
As reported by Reuters, Canadian authorities have reportedly announced new restrictions on research grants, with the goal of blocking funding to projects with researchers affiliated with institutions with ties to foreign governments that may pose a risk to national security. The reported goal of the policy is to “protect our country, our institutions, and our intellectual property”.
According to a joint statement by the Minister of Innovation, Science and Industry, the Minister of Health, and the Minister of Public Safety – grant applications that involve conducting research in a “sensitive research area” will reportedly not be funded if any of the researchers are affiliated with a university, research institute, or laboratory connected to military, national defence, or state security entities of foreign actors that pose a risk to Canada’s national security. While the statement did not mention particular countries, many reportedly suspect that Russia and China are on the list of state actors that researchers cannot be affiliated with in order to receive research grants.
Some have reportedly raised concerns about the new policy. Tamer Özsu, a computer scientist at the University of Waterloo, reportedly worries that “Canada could lose its reputation as a good partner in international collaborations”. Others, like Chad Gaffield, head of U15, an organization that represents the 15 largest Canadian research universities, reportedly believe that the new policy properly balances making “research as open as possible and as secure as necessary”.
Authors: Arash Rouhi and Olivia Moon
Photo Credit: https://unsplash.com/@thisisengineering
Authors
Expertise
Insights
-
Intellectual Property Litigation
Trademarks Opposition Board Moves to Digital-Only Submission of Confidential Information
As of June 1, 2026, the Trademarks Opposition Board (TMOB) requires all confidential evidence and documentation in proceedings under sections 11.13, 38, or 45 of the Trademarks Act (the “Act”) to be… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Kansas City Chiefs Stars Sued for Trademark Infringement Over Steakhouse
The sneaker company, 1587 Sneakers, is reportedly suing Kansas City Chiefs players, Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce, along with their restaurant partners, for trademark infringement.1587 Sneakers… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Pecking Order Problem: Pudgy Penguins Faces Penguin Trademark Lawsuit
As reported by Bloomberg Law News, PEI Licensing (“PEI”), the owner of the Penguin apparel brand, has sued Pudgy Penguins NFT (“Pudgy Penguins”) for trademark infringement.Pudgy Penguins started as a… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Old Brand, New Problems? Nike’s Attempt to Revive “Total 90” Soccer Cleats
Nike is reportedly attempting to revive its classic “Total 90” soccer cleat line, but has encountered an unexpected setback. Total90, LLC has reportedly asserted that Nike is infringing its… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
A Swing and a Miss: The “All Rise” Trademark Attempt
As reported by Bloomberg, attempts to register marks covering the phrases “All Rise” and “Here Comes the Judge” were rejected by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. In… -
Intellectual Property Litigation
Hershey’s Kisses Go to Court – Federal Court of Appeal Decision in PIM Brands Inc. v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC
The Federal Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Promotion in Motion, Inc. (PIM Brands, Inc.) v. Hershey Chocolate & Confectionery LLC offers fresh guidance on how courts evaluate survey evidence…